Reducing false-positive detections by combining two stage-1 computer-aided mass detection algorithms

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6144 III, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bedard, Noah D ^a   Sampat, Mehul P ^a   Stokes, Patrick A ^a   Markey, Mia K ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

BOWYER'S ALGORITHM; BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION; DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY (DDSM);

TUMORS;

EID: 33745181199     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.656468     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2005. 2005, American Cancer Society: Atlanta.
2. Feuer, E.J., et al., The Lifetime Risk of Developing Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993. 85(11): p. 892-897.
3. Wun, L., R.M. Merrill, and E.J. Feuer, Estimating Lifetime and Age-Conditional Probabilities of Developing Cancer. Lifetime Data Analysis, 1998. 4: p. 169-186.
4. Kerlikowske, K., et al., Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000. 133(11): p. 855-63.
5. Kolb, T.M., J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse, Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.[see comment]. Radiology, 2002. 225(1): p. 165-75.
6. Bird, R.E., T.W. Wallace, and B.C. Yankaskas, Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology., 1992. 184(3): p. 613-7.
7. Giger, M.L., Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. Academic Radiology, 2002. 9(1): p. 1-3.
8. Sampat, M.P., M.K. Markey, and A.C. Bovik, Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography, in Handbook of Image and Video Processing, A.C. Bovik, Editor. 2005, Academic Press, p. 1195-1217.
9. Heath, M.D. and K.W. Bowyer. Mass Detection by Relative Image Intensity, in 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2000. Toronto, Canada.
10. Yin, F.F., et al., Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Medical Physics., 1991. 18(5): p. 955-63.
11. Zheng, B., Y.H. Chang, and D. Gur, Computerized detection of masses from digitized mammograms: comparison of single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction. Academic Radiology, 1995. 2(12): p. 1056-61.
12. Mendez, A.J., et al., Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms. Medical Physics., 1998. 25(6): p. 957-64.
13. Heath, M., et al. The Digital Database for Screening Mammography. in 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2000. Toronto, Canada.
14. Gavrielides, M.A., J.Y. Lo, and C.E. Floyd, Jr., Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Medical Physics, 2002. 29(4): p. 475-83.