Evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 106-110

  Yilmaz, Yucel ^a   Simsek, Sera ^a   Dalmis, Anya ^a   Gurbuz, Taskin ^a   Kocogullari, M Elcin ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUA MERON; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN;

CEMENTATION; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; STAINLESS STEEL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 33745172810     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Humphrey WP. Use of chrome steel in children's dentistry. Dent Surv 1950; 26: 945-949.
2. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon MEJ, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 282-288.
3. Messer LB, Levering NJ. The durability of primary molar restorations: II. Observations and predictions of success of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 1988; 10: 81-85.
4. Einwag J, Dünninger P. Stainless steel crown versus multisurface amalgam restorations: An 8-year longitudinal clinical study. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 321-323.
5. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Restorative dentistry. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 7th ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 2000; 384-412.
6. Noffsinger DP, Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA. Effects of polycarboxylate and glass-ionomer cements on stainless steel crown retention. Pediatr Dent 1983; 5: 68-71.
7. Myers DR, Bell RA, Barenie JT. The effect of cement type and tooth preparation on the retention of stainless steel crowns. J Pedod 1981; 5: 275-280.
8. Savide NL, Caputo AA, Luke LS. The effect of tooth preparation on the retention of stainless steel crowns. J Dent Child 1979; 46: 385-389.
9. García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of the retention of preformed crowns using two dental cements. J Pedod 1984; 8: 339-344.
10. Karatoprak O, Kirzioglu Z. Comparison of the microleakage and cementing characteristics of three different cements used to cement stainless steel crowns. Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hek Fak Derg 1997; 1: 21-27. (In Turkish, English abstract).
11. Mathewson RJ, Lu KH, Talebi R. Dental cement retentive force comparison on stainless steel crowns. J Calif Dent Assoc 1974; 2: 42-45.
12. Braff MH. A Comparison between stainless steel crowns and multisurface amalgams in primary molars. J Dent Child 1975; 42: 474478.
13. García-Godoy F, Bugg JL. Clinical evaluation of glass cementation on stainless steel crown retention. J Pedod 1987; 11: 339-344.
14. García-Godoy F, Landry JK. Evaluation of stainless steel crowns luted with a glass-ionomer cement. J Pedod 1989; 13: 328-330.
15. McComb D, Nathanson D. Glass-ionomer luting cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1999; 149-170.
16. Wilson AD, Groffrman DM, Kuhn AT. The release of fluoride and other chemical species from a glass-ionomer cement. Biomater 1985; 6: 431-433.
17. Powers JM. Cements. In: Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002; 593-634.
18. Smith DC. Development of glass-ionomer cement systems. Biomater 1998; 19: 467-478.
19. Millett DT, Duff S, Morrison L, Cummings A, Gilmour H. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 15-20.
20. Shillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jocobi R, Brackett SE. Finishing and cementation. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed, Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1997; 385-418.
21. Dahl BL, OiIo G. Retentive properties of luting cements: An in vitro investigation. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 17-20.
22. Maldonado A, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. An in vitro study of certain properties of glass-ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96: 785-791.
23. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Cements. Dental materials properties and manipulation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000; 116-137.
24. de Gee AJ. Physical properties of glass-ionomer cements: Setting shrinkage and wear. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1999; 51-65.
25. Dawson LR, Simon JF, Taylor PP. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars. J Dent Child 1981; 48: 420-422.
26. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 129-138.
27. Ash MM, Ramfjord S. Occlusion in operative and restorative dentistry. Occlusion. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1995; 390-444.