Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3855-3864

  Hakami, Amir ^a   Seinfeld, John H ^a   Chai, Tianfeng ^b   Tang, Youhua ^b   Carmichael, Gregory R ^b   Sandu, Adrian ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERSTATE TRANSPORT; NONATTAINMENT MAGNITUDE; SCALE CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODEL (STEM);

AIR QUALITY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; OZONE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

NITROGEN OXIDE; OZONE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; OZONE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AIR QUALITY; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; BIOGENIC EMISSION; EMISSION; NITROGEN OXIDES; OZONE; OZONE DEPLETION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AIR QUALITY; AIR QUALITY STANDARD; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION; CALCULATION; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PREDICTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROUS OXIDE; OZONE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; VOLATILIZATION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; OHIO RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745157154     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es052135g     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Dunker, A. M. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 2385-2393.
2. Yang, Y.-J.; Wilkinson, J. G.; Russell, A. G. Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2859-2868.
3. Hakami, A.; Odman, M. T.; Russell, A. G. High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2442-2452.
4. Marchuk, G. I. Numerical Solution of the Problems of the Dynamics of the Atmosphere and the Ocean (in Russian). Gidrometeoizdat: St. Petersburg, 1974.
5. Marchuk, G. I. Mathematical Models in Environmental Problems; Elsevier Science Publication Co.: New York, 1986.
6. Cacuci, D. G. Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach. J. Math. Phys. (Woodbury, N. Y.) 1981, 22 (12), 2794-2802.
7. Cacuci, D. G.; Ionescu-Bujor, M. Deterministic local sensitivity analysis of augmented systems-I: Theory. Nucl Sci. Engin. 2005, 151, 55-66.
8. Eibern, H.; Schmidt, H.; Talagrand, O.; Ebel, A. 4D-variational data assimilation with an adjoint air quality model for emission analysis. Environ. Modell. Software 2000, 15, 539-548.
9. Eibern, H.; Schmidt, H. Ozone episode analysis by four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 3569-3590.
10. Hakami, A.; Henze, D. K.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Chai, T.; Tang, Y.; Carmichael, G. R.; Sandu, A. Adjoint inverse modeling of black carbon during the Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 2005, 110, D14301, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005671.
11. Vukicevic, T.; Hess, P. Analysis of tropospheric transport in the Pacific Basin using the adjoint technique. J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105, 7213-7230.
12. Vautard, R.; Beekmann, M.; Menut, L. Applications of adjoint modelling in atmospheric chemistry: Sensitivity and inverse modelling. Environ. Modell. Software 2000, 15, 703-709.
13. Menut, L. Adjoint modeling for atmospheric pollution process sensitivity at regional scale. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D17), 8562, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002549.
14. Schmidt, H.; Martin, D. Adjoint sensitivity of episodic ozone in the Paris area to emissions on the continental scale. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D17), 8561, doi: 10.1029/2001JD001583, 2003.
15. Sandu, A.; Daescu, D. N.; Carmichael, G. R. Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of chemical kinetic systems with KPP: Part I: theory and software tools. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 5083-5096.
16. Sandu, A.; Daescu, D. N.; Carmichael, G. R.; Chai, T. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 204, 222-252.
17. Lippmann, M. Health effects of tropospheric ozone: review of recent research findings and their implications to ambient air quality standards. J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1993, 3, 103-129.
18. Bell, M. L.; McDermott, A.; Zeger, S. L.; Samet, J. M.; Dominici, F. Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities. 1987-2000, JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2004, 292, 2372-2378.
19. Bell, M. L.; Dominici, F.; Samet, J. M. A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Epidemiology 2005, 16, 436-445.
20. Ito, K.; De Leon, S. F.; Lippmann, M. Associations between ozone and daily mortality: Analysis and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2005, 16, 446-457.
21. Levy, J. I.; Chemerynski, S. M.; Sarnat, J. A. Ozone Exposure and Mortality: An Empiric Bayes Meta-regression Analysis. Epidemiology 2005, 16, 458-468.
22. Final report volume I: Executive summary; Ozone Transport Assessment Group Air Quality and Analysis Workgroup, Ozone Transport Assessment Group: Newport, RI, 1997.
23. Rao, S. T.; Mount, T. D.; Dorris, G. Least Cost Control Strategies to Reduce Ozone in the Northeastern Urban Corridor; The NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Air Resources: Albany, NY, 1999.
24. Ryerson, T. B.; Trainer, M.; Holloway, J. S.; Parrish, D. D.; Huey, L. G.; Sueper, D. T.; Frost, G. J.; Donnelly, S. G.; Schauffler, S.; Atlas, E. L.; Kuster, W. C.; Goldan, P. D.; Hubler, G.; Meagher, J. F.; Fehsenfeld, F. C. Observations of ozone formation in power plant plumes and implications for ozone control strategies. Science 2001, 292, 719-723.
25. x from large point sources: variability in ozone production, resulting health damages and economic costs. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 2851-2866.
26. Carmichael, G. R.; Tang, Y.; Kurata, G.; Uno, I.; Streets, D.; Woo, J. H.; Huang, H.; Yienger, J.; Lefer, B.; Shetter, R.; Blake, D.; Atlas, E.; Fried, A.; Apel, E.; Eisele, F.; Cantrell, C.; Avery, M.; Barrick, J.; Sachse, G.; Brune, W.; Sandholm, S.; Kondo, Y.; Singh, H.; Talbot, R.; Bandy, A.; Thorton, D.; Clarke, A.; Heikes, B. Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D21), 8823, doi: 10.1029/2002JD003117.
27. Seinfeld, J. H.; Pandis, S. N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley: New York, 1998.
28. Jacobson, M. Z. Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1998.
29. Miehe, P.; Sandu, A.; Carmichael, G. R.; Tang, Y.; Daescu, D. A communication library for the parallelization of air quality models on structured grids. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3917-3930.
30. Carter, W. P. L. Documentation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism for VOC reactivity assessment; Final report to the California Air Resources Board, Contracts 92-329 and 95-308; Riverside, CA, 2000.
31. Hakami, A.; Odman, M. T.; Russell, A. G. Nonlinearity in atmospheric response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D15303, doi: 10.1029/2003JD004502.
32. Caplan, C. C. The failure of current legal and regulatory mechanisms to control interstate ozone transport: The need for new national legislation. Ecol. Law Quart. 2001, 28, 169-222.
33. Dinan, T.; Tawil, N. Solving environmental problems with regional decision-making: A case study of ground-level ozone. Nat. Tax J. 2003, LVI, 123-138.