Fertilizer potential of liquid and solid effluent from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of poultry waste

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 69-79

  Liedl, B E ^a   Bombardiere, J ^a   Chatfield, J M ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digester; Chicken litter; Crop nutrition; Hydroponics; Livestock residuals

Indexed keywords

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CROPS; FARMS; FERTILIZERS; NITRATES;

CHICKEN LITTER; CROP NUTRITION; HYDROPONICS; LIVESTOCK RESIDUALS; THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC TREATMENT;

EFFLUENT TREATMENT;

AMMONIA; INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; NITROGEN; NITROGEN FERTILIZER; ORGANIC FERTILIZER; PHOSPHORUS;

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CROPS; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; FARMS; FERTILIZERS; NITRATES;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; EFFLUENT; FERTILIZER; HYDROPONICS; LITTER; POULTRY; WASTE TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BLUEBERRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP MANAGEMENT; EFFLUENT; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FRUIT; GRASSLAND; HARVEST; HYDROPONICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTUCE; LIVESTOCK; POULTRY FARMING; SOIL ANALYSIS; VEGETABLE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; FERTILIZERS; POULTRY; REFUSE DISPOSAL; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

LACTUCA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; VACCINIUM;

EID: 33745135450     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.237     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aillery, M., Gollehon, N. and Breneman, V. (2005). Technical Documentation of the Regional Manure Management Model for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USDA, Economic Research Service, Technical Bull. No. TB1913.
2. Allen, D., Katovich, E. and Nelson, C. (2003). Fertilizer value and weed seed destruction potential of digested manure. Proc. of Anaerobic Digester Technology Applications in Animal Agriculture, pp. 206-217.
3. Baines, S. (1970). Anaerobic treatment of farm wastes, Proc. Symp. Farm Wastes, Institute of Water Pollution Control, Paper No. 18., University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
4. Basden, T.J. (2003). Changes in poultry production strategies to improve water quality: 1994 to 1999. Proc. of the USDA-CSREES National Water Quality Coordinators' Conference, Jan 12-15, 2003, Tucson, AZ.
5. Center for Agriculture in the Environment (2005). The Environmental Benefits of Well-Managed Farmland, Report Working Paper 2005-01, Center for Agriculture in the Environment, DeKalb, IL, USA.
6. Chung Po, H.H. and Wong, S.K. (1975). Small methane generator for waste disposal. Proc. 3rd Intl. Symp. Livestock Wastes. Urbana, IL 21-24 April.
7. Erickson, L.E. (2000). Bioreactors. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 2nd edn, Vol. 1. Lederberg, J. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 579-586.
8. Gilmour, J.T., Cogger, C.G., Jacobs, L.W., Evanylo, G.K. and Sullivan, D.M. (2003). Decomposition and plant-available nitrogen in biosolids: Laboratory studies, field studies, and computer simulation. J. Environ. Qual., 32, 1498-1507.
9. Gollehon, N., Caswell, M., Ribaudo, M., Kellogg, R., Lander, C. and Letson, D. (2001). Confined Animal Production and Manure Nutrients, USDA, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bull. No. AIB771.
10. Jones, J.B., Jr. (1999). Tomato plant culture: In the field, greenhouse, and home garden, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
11. Liedl, B.E., Cummins, M., Young, A., Williams, M.L. and Chatfield, J.M. (2004a). Hydroponic lettuce production using liquid effluent from poultry waste bioremediation as a nutrient source. Acta Hort., 659, 721-728.
12. Liedl, B.E., Cummins, M., Young, A., Williams, M.L. and Chatfield, J.M. (2004b). Liquid effluent from poultry waste bioremediation as a potential nutrient source for hydroponic tomato production. Acta Hort., 659, 647-652.
13. - nutrition with and without pH adjustment on tomato growth, ion composition and water relations. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 102, 78-81.
14. Pill, W.G., Lambeth, V.N. and Hinkley, T.M. (1978). Effects of nitrogen form and level on ion concentration, water stress and blossom-end rot incidence in tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 103, 265-286.
15. Ribaudo, M., Gollehon, N., Aillery, M., Kaplan, J., Johansson, R., Agapoff, J., Christensen, L., Breneman, V. and Peters, M. (2003). Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land, USDA, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. AER824.
16. Shearin, T.E., Cheng, J., Peet, M.M. and Willits, D.H. (2003). Utilization of nutrients in anaerobically pretreated swine wastewater for greenhouse tomato production. Proc. of the 9th Intl. Animal, Agric. and Food Processing Wastes, Durhan, NC, USA, pp. 107-112.
17. Stafford, D.A., Hawkes, D.L. and Horton, R.H. (1980). Methane Production from Waste Organic Matter, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
18. Sutton, A.L., Adeola, O., Schinckel, A.P., Kelly, D.T. and Meyerholtz, K.A. (1995). Improving dietary phosphorus in swine to reduce phosphorus levels in manure. Proc. of the 7th Intl. Symp. of Agric. and Food Processing Wastes, ASAE, St Joseph, Michigan, USA, pp. 107-113.
19. Suzuki, K., Haga, K., Ikeuchi, Y., Takeuchi, M., Hara, M. and Wakita, M. (2004). Utilization of anaerobic digestion effluent of swine manure for Italian ryegrass and cabbage. Preprints of the 10th World Congress Anaerobic Digestion Montreal, Canada, Vol. 3, pp. 1845-1847.
20. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (2003). Market value of agricultural sales for West Virginia. http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/ census97/rankings/wvsales.htm.
21. Williams, P.E.V. (1995). Animal production and European pollution problems. Animal Feed Sci. Tech., 53, 135-144.