Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Soleimani, Manuchehr ^a   Gómez Laberge, Camille ^b   Adler, Andy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electrical impedance tomography; Electrode movement; Image reconstruction; Regularization

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONDUCTIVITY CHANGES; ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENT; ELECTRODE MOVEMENT; IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION; IMPEDANCE DISTRIBUTION; INTERNAL IMPEDANCE; JACOBIANS; POSITION UNCERTAINTIES; REGULARISATION; SMOOTHNESS CONSTRAINTS;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONDUCTANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRODE; IMAGING SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 33745133054     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S09     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Adler A and Lionheart W R B 2006 Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT Physiol. Meas. 27 S25-42
2. Adler A and Guardo R 1996 Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 170-9
3. Adler A, Guardo R and Berthiaume Y 1996 Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion? IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 414-20
4. Barber D C and Brown B H 1988 Errors in reconstruction of resistivity images using a linear reconstruction technique Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9 101-4
5. Blott B H, Daniell G J and Meeson S 1998 Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations Phys. Med. Biol. 43 1731-9
6. Breckon W and Pidcock M 1988 Data errors and reconstruction algorithms in electrical impedance tomography Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9 105-9
7. Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell J C, Simske C and Goble J C 1990 NOSER: an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem Int. J. Imaging Syst. & Technol. 2 66-75
8. Coulombe N, Gagnon H, Marquis F, Skrobik Y and Guardo R 2005 A parametric model of the relationship between EIT and total lung volume Physiol. Meas. 26 401-11
9. Frerichs I 2000 Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in applications related to lung and ventilation: a review of experimental and clinical activities Physiol. Meas. 21 R1-21
10. Gersing E, Hoffman B and Osypka M 1996 Influence of changing peripheral geometry on electrical impedance tomography measurements Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 34 359-61
11. Han D D K and Prosperetti A 1999 A shape decomposition technique in electrical impedance tomography J. Comput. Phys. 155 75-95
12. Harris N D, Suggett A J, Barber D C and Brown B H 1988 Applied potential tomography: a new technique for monitoring pulmonary function Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9 79-85
13. Heikkinen L M, Vilhunen T, West R M and Vauhkonen M 2002 Simultaneous reconstruction of electrode contact impedances and internal electrical properties: II. Laboratory experiments Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1855-61
14. Kiber A, Barber D C and Brown B H 1990 Estimation of Object Boundary Shape from the Voltage Gradient Measurements Proc. Meet. on Electrical Impedance Tomography (Copenhagen) ed T K Hames pp 52-9
15. Kolehmainen V, Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen P A and Kaipio J P 1997 Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns Physiol. Meas. 18 289-303
16. Kolehmainen V, Voutilainen A and Kaipio J P 2001 Estimation of non-stationary region boundaries in EIT-state estimation approach Inverse Problems 17 1937-56
17. Kolehmainen V, Lassas M and Ola P 2006 Inverse conductivity problem with an imperfectly known boundary SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66 (2) 365-383
18. Lionheart W R B 1998 Boundary shape and electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 14 139-47
19. Lozano A, Rosell J and Pallás-Areny R 1995 Errors in prolonged electrical impedance measurements due to electrode repositioning and postural changes Physiol. Meas. 16 121-30
20. Lozano A 1997 Electrode errors in bioimpedance measurements for long-term applications Proc. 16th Southern Biomed. Eng. Conf. (Biloxi, USA) pp 3-6
21. Molebny V V, Lionheart W R B, Vovk P P, Mykytenko Y H and Gouz V I 1996 Sensor position measurement for electroimpedance tomography Med. & Biol. Eng. Comput. 34 177-8
22. Soleimani M, Abascal J F P J and Lionheart W R B 2004 Simultaneous reconstruction of the boundary shape and conductivity in 3D electrical impedance tomography Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Electrical Bio-Impedance V. Electrical Impedance Tomography (Gdansk, Poland) pp 475-8
23. Soleimani M, Sadleir R and Jersey-Willuhn K 2003 Simultaneous reconstruction of the boundary shape and conductivity in 2D electrical impedance tomography Proc. 3rd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (Banff, Canada) pp 695-700
24. Tossavainen O-P, Vauhkonen M, Heikkinen L M and Savolainen T 2004 Estimating shapes and free surfaces with electrical impedance tomography Meas. Sci. Technol. 15 1402-11
25. Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen P A and Kaipio J P 1998 A Kalman filter approach applied to the tracking of fast organ boundaries Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 20 1048-51
26. Zhang J and Patterson R P 2005 EIT images of ventilation: what contributes to the resistivity changes? Physiol. Meas. 26 S81-92