Discovering expressive transformation rules from saxophone jazz performances

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 319-330

  Ramirez, Rafael ^a   Hazan, Amaury ^a   Gómez, Emilia ^a   Maestre, Esteban ^a   Serra, Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745131068     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298210600578097     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Van Baelen, E. & De Raedt, L. (1996). Analysis and prediction of piano performances using inductive logic programming. International Conference in Inductive Logic Programming. Stockholm: Springer Verlag, pp. 55-71.
2. Bresin, R. (2002). Articulation rules for automatic music performance. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, International Computer Music Association, pp. 294-297.
3. Canazza, S., De Poli, G., Roda, A. & Vidolin, A. (1997). Analysis and synthesis of expressive intention in a clarinet performance. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, International Computer Music Association, pp. 113-120.
4. Chen, M., Jan, J. & Yu, P.S. (1996). Data mining: An overview from a database perpective. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 5(6), 866-883.
5. Colmenauer, A. (1990). An introduction to PROLOG-III. Communications of the ACM, 33(1), 69-91.
6. Dannenberg, R.B. & Derenyi, I. (1998). Combining instrument and performance models for high-quality music synthesis. Journal of New Music Research, 27(3), 211-238.
7. Dovey, M.J. (1995). Analysis of Rachmaninoff's piano performances using inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Machine Learning. Crete: Springer Verlag, pp. 279-282.
8. Friberg, A., Bresin, R., Fryden, L. & Sunberg, J. (1998). Musical punctuation on the microlevel: Automatic identification and performance of small melodic units. Journal of New Music Research, 27(3), 217-292.
9. Friberg, A., Bresin, R. & Fryden, L. (2000). Music from motion: Sound level envelopes of tones expressing human locomotion. Journal of New Music Research, 29(3), 199-210.
10. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In: D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd edn). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
11. Gómez, E., Gouyon, F., Herrera, P. & Amatriain, X. (2003). Using and enhancing the current MPEG-7 standard for a music content processing tool. Proceedings of the 114th Audio Engineering Society Convention, Amsterdam: Academic Press.
12. Gómez, E., Grachten, M., Amatriain, X. & Arcos, J. (2003). Melodic characterization of monophonic recordings for expressive tempo transformations. In: R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference.
13. Igarashi, S. Ozaki, T. & Furukawa, K. (2002). Respiration reflecting musical expression: analysis of respiration during musical performance by inductive logic programming. In: C. Anagnostopoulou, M. Ferrand & A. Smaill (Eds.), Proceedings of Second International Conference on Music and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.
14. Johnson, M.L. (1992). An expert system for the articulation of Bach fugue melodies. In: D.L. Baggi (Ed.), Readings in computer-generated music. IEEE Computer Society, New York, pp. 41-51.
15. Klapuri, A. (1999). Sound onset detection by applying psychoacoustic knowledge. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP, Phoenix, AZ: IEEE.
16. Lopez de Mantaras, R. & Arcos, J.L. (2002). AI and music, from composition to expressive performance. AI Magazine, 23-3, 43-57.
17. Maher, R.C. & Beauchamp, J.W. (1994). Fundamental frequency estimation of musical signals using a two-way mismatch procedure. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 95, 2254-2263.
18. McNab, R.J., Smith, Ll.A. & Witten, I.H. (1996). Signal processing for melody transcription. In: K. Ramamohanarao (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Computer Science Conference. Melbourne: Springer Verlag, pp. 301-307.
19. Mitchell, T.M. (1997). Machine learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Morales, E. (1997). PAL: A pattern-based first-order inductive system. Machine Learning, 26, 227-252.
21. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Narmour, E. (1991). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: The implication realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Quinlan, J.R. (1990). Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5, 239-266.
24. Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Ramirez, R., Hazan, A., Gómez, E. & Maestre, E. (2004). A machine learning approach to expressive performance in jazz standards. In: L. Khan & V. Petrushin (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Seattle, WA, USA: Springer Verlag.
26. Ramirez, R. & Hazan, A. (2005). Modeling expressive music performance in jazz. Proceedings of the 18th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2005). Clearwater Beach, FL: AAAI Press.
27. Ramirez, R., Hazan, A. & Maestre, E. (2005). Intra-note features prediction model for jazz saxophone performance. Proceedings of International Computer Music Conference 2005. Barcelona: ICMA.
28. Repp, B.H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance: An analysis of timing microstructure in Schumann's Traumerei'. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 25-46.
29. Shapiro, E. (1983). Algorithmic program debugging. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
30. Srinivasan, A. (2001). The Aleph manual.
31. Tobudic, A. & Widmer, G. (2003). Relational IBL in music with a new structural similarity measure. In: C. Palamidessi (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming. Springer Verlag, pp. 365-382.
32. Todd, N. (1992). The dynamics of dynamics: A model of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 35-40.
33. Widmer, G. (2001). Discovering strong principles of expressive music performance with the PLCG rule learning strategy. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML'01), Freiburg, Germany. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
34. Widmer, G. (2002a). Machine discoveries: A few simple, robust local expression principles. Journal of New Music Research, 31(1), 37-50.
35. Widmer, G. (2002b). In search of the Horowitz factor: Interim report on a musical discovery project. Invited paper. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Discovery Science (DS'02), Lübeck, Germany. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.