Analysis of parenchymal patterns using conspicuous spatial frequency features in mammograms applied to the BI-RADS density rating scheme

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6144 I, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Perconti, Philip ^a   Loew, Murray ^a  

^a George Washington University   (United States)

Author keywords

Mammographic density; Salience based features

Indexed keywords

DENSITY RATING; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; REGIONS OF INTEREST; SALIENCE-BASED FEATURES;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; FEATURE EXTRACTION; RADIOLOGY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 33745125074     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.654061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Harvey, J.A., Bovbjerg, V.E., Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: Relationship with breast cancer. Radiology, 2004: p. 29-41.
2. Wolfe, J.N., Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am. Jour. Roentgenol, 1976. 126: p. 1130-1139.
3. Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J. National Cancer Inst., 1995. 87(670-675).
4. Byng, J.W., et al., Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. RadioGraphics, 1998. 18(6): p. 1587-1598.
5. Wolfe, J.N., Saftlas, A.F., Salane, M., Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: A case control study. Am. Jour. Roentgenol, 1987. 148: p. 1087-1092.
6. American College of Radiology, ACR BI_RADS - mammography, 4th edition, in ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. 2003, American College of Radiology: Reston, VA.
7. Prevrhal, S., et al., Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: Results of formal operator training. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2002. 11: p. 1389-1393.
8. Byng, J.W., et al., Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phsy. Med. Biol., 1996. 41: p. 909-923.
9. Tachoces, P.G., et al., Computer-assisted diagnosis: The classification of breast parenchymal patterns. Phsy. Med. Biol., 1995. 40: p. 103-117.
10. Heine, J.J., Velthuizen, R.P., A statitical methodology for mammographic density detection. Medical Physics, 2000. 27(12): p. 2644-2651.
11. Huo, Z., et al., Computer analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection. Medical Physics, 2000. 27(1): p. 4-12.
12. Hui, L., Giger, M.L.,Huo, Z., Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: Effect of ROI size and location. Medical Physics, 2004. 31(3): p. 549-555.
13. Perconti, P., Loew, M.H., Salient features in mammograms using Gabor filters and clustering. in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. 2004: SPIE, Vol. 5372 p. 72-81.
14. Perconti, P., Loew, M.H., Conspicuous spatial frequency features in mammograms using a mixed-effects model. in Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. 2005: SPIE, 5749 p. 103-113.
15. Perconti, P., Loew, M.H., Evidence for correlation between mammogram feature conspicuity & lesion time-to-first-hit. in Medical Imaging Perception Society XI. 2005. Windemere, UK
16. Rosenholtz, R., A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion pop-out phenomena. Vision Research, 1999. 39: p. 3157-3163.
17. Collomosse, J.P.,Hall, P.M., Painterly rendering using image salience. in Proceedings of the 20th Eurographics UK Conference. 2002: IEEE Computer Society, p. 122-128.
18. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Pattern classification and scene analysis. 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
19. Young, I.T., Further consideration of sample and feature size. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 1978. 24(6): p. 773-775.
20. Daly, S., The visible difference predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity, in Digital images and human vision, Watson, A.B., Editor. 1993, The MIT Press: Cambridge, p. 179 - 206.
21. Peli, E., Contrast in complex images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 1990. 7(10): p. 2032-2040.
22. Heath, M.D., Bowyer, K.W., Kopans, D., Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography, in Digital mammography. 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York. p. 457-460.