Survival and growth of Erwinia amylovora on apple leaves

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 704, Issue , 2006, Pages 121-126

  Norelli, J L ^a   Brandl, M T ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b WESTERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fire blight; Glandular trichome; Hydathode; Malus x domestica; Shoot blight

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ERWINIA AMYLOVORA; LONCHOCARPUS CAPASSA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 33745104460     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2006.704.14     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blakeman, J.P. 1993. Pathogens in the foliar environment. Plant Pathol. 42:479-493.
2. Heald, F.D. 1915. Preliminay note on leaf invasions by Bacillus amylovorus. Washington State College of Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 125, Pullman, Washington.
3. Ishimaru, C. and Kips, E.J. 1984. New medium for detection of Erwinia amylovora and its use in epidemiological studies. Phytopathology 74:1342-1345.
4. Lewis, S. and Goodman, R.N. 1966. The glandular trichomes, hydathodes and lenticels of Jonathan apple and their relation to infection by Erwinia amylovora. Phytopath. Z. 55:352-358.
5. Maas Geesteranus, H.P. and de Vries, Ph.M. 1984. Survival of Erwinia amylovora bacteria on plant surfaces and their role in epidemiology. Acta Hort. 151:55-61.
6. Miller, W.G., Leveau, J.H.J. and Lindow, S.E. 2000. Improved gfp and inaZ broad-host range promoter-probe vectors. MPMI 13:1243-1250.
7. Ockey, S.C. and Thomson, S.V. 2001. Spatial and temporal attributes of Erwinia amylovora on apple and pear leaves following natural inoculation. Phytopathology 91:S67 (abstract).
8. Paulin, J.-P. 2000. Erwinia amylovora: general characteristics, biochemistry and serology. p. 87-115. In: J.L. Vanneste (ed.), Fire Blight, The Disease and its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
9. Rosenberger, D.A. and VanCamp, K.L. 2003. Temperature declines during storms and irrigation may contribute to fire blight infection of pear fruit. Plant Health Progress doi: 10.1094/PHP-2003-0310-01-RS.
10. Smith, T.J. 1999. Report on the development and use of Cougarblight 98C- A situation-specific fire blight risk assessment model for apple and pear. Acta Hort. 489:429-433.
11. Steiner, P.W. 1990a. Predicting apple blossom infections by Erwinia amylovora using the MARYBLYT model. Acta Hort. 273:139-148.
12. Steiner, P.W. 1990b. Predicting canker, shoot and trauma blight phases of apple fire blight epidemics using the MARYBLYT model. Acta Hort. 273:149-156.
13. Steiner, P.W. and Lightner, G.W. 1992. MARYBLYT™ 4.2, A predictive program for forecasting fire blight disease in apples and pears. Pest Management Supply, Inc., Hadley, MA. p.48.
14. Thomson, S.V. 1986. The role of the stigma in fire blight infections. Phytopathology 76:476-482.
15. Thomson, S.V. 2000. Epidemiology of fire blight. p.9-36. In: J.L. Vanneste (ed.), Fire Blight, The Disease and its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK