The limited utility of Utilitarian analysis

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 67-69

  Strong, Carson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION THEORY; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMAN; MORALITY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DECISION THEORY; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; MORALS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745081455     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160600686141     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. Baron, J. 2006. A decision analysis of consent. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 46-56.
2. Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Gert, B. 1973. The moral rules: A new rational foundation for morality. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
4. Gert, B. 2005. Morality: Its nature and justification, revised edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Strong, C. 1988. Justification in ethics. In Moral theory and moral judgments in medical ethics, ed. B. A. Brody, 193-211. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Strong, C. 1997. Ethics in reproductive and perinatal medicine: A new framework. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.