Quantitative classification as a tool to show change in an urbanizing watershed

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 26, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 4923-4939

  Clapham Jr , W B ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RADAR IMAGING; SATELLITES; WATERSHEDS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL LINE GRAPH; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER;

REMOTE SENSING;

ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; GIS; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; SATELLITE IMAGERY; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION; WATERSHED;

NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745077755     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500222665     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Booth, D. B. and Jackson, C. R. (1997) Urbanization of aquatic systems. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 33, pp. 1077-1090.
2. Chen, J. and Gong, P. and He, C. and Pu, R. and Shi, P. (2003) Land-use/ land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, pp. 369-379.
3. Clapham, W. B., Jr. (2001) Using satellite imagery with digitized aerial photography for ecological analysis in small urban watersheds. Environmental Practice, 3, pp. 48-62.
4. Clapham, W. B., Jr. (2003) Continuum-based classification of remotely sensed imagery to describe urban sprawl on a watershed scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, pp. 322-340.
5. Karr, J. R. and Chu, E. W. (2000) Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, pp. 1-14.
6. Leica Geosystems.(2004) ERDAS Imagine, version 8.7. In. Atlanta GA
7. Lim, A. and LeDrew, E. F.(2003) Monitoring change in coral reef environments. In. Poster presented at 25th Canadian Remote Sensing Symposium, Montreal, Canada
8. Lunetta, R. S. and Elvidge, C. D.(1998). In Remote Sensing Change Detection. Ann Arbor MI: Ann Arbor Press.
9. Malila, W.(1980) Change vector analysis: An approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Symposium on Machine Processsing of Remotely Sensed Data. (pp. 326-335).
10. Miltner, R. J. and White, D. and Yoder, C. (2004) The biotic integrity of streams in urban and suburbanizing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, pp. 87-100.
11. Research Systems.(2001) RiverTools, version 2.4. In. Boulder CA
12. Ridd, M. (1995) Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: Comparative anatomy for cities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, pp. 2165-2185.
13. Schuler, T. R. (1994) The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1, pp. 100-111.
14. Steedman, R. J. (1988) Modification and assessment of and Index of Biotic Integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 45, pp. 492-501.
15. Stevens, S. S. (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, pp. 677-680.
16. Warner, T. (2005) Hyperspherical direction cosine change vector analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 1201-1215.