Improving evidence-based practice in rehabilitation: Introducing PsycBITE™

Aphasiology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 676-683

  McDonald, Skye ^a   Tate, Robyn ^b   Togher, Leanne ^b   Perdices, Michael ^c   Moseley, Anne ^b   Winders, Kiri ^b   Shultz, Regina ^b   Smith, Kate ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c ROYAL NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BRAIN DYSFUNCTION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DATA BASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; REHABILITATION CARE; SPEECH DISORDER; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 33745070905     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030600724861     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Code, C. (2000) The problem with RCTs. RCSLT Bulletin, March, pp. 14-15.
2. (2002). In Users guide to the medical literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago IL: American Medical Association Press.
3. Herbert, R. and Moseley, A. and Sherrington, C. (1998/99) PEDro: A database of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Health Information Management, 28, pp. 186-188.
4. Howard, D. (1986) Beyond randomised controlled trials: The case for effective case studies of the effects of treatment of aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, pp. 89-102.
5. Maher, C. G. and Sherrington, C. and Herbert, R. D. and Moseley, A. M. and Elkins, M. (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83, pp. 713-721.
6. Moseley, A. and Sherrington, C. and Herbert, R. and Maher, C. (2000) The extent and quality of evidence in neurological physiotherapy: An analysis of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Brain Impairment, 1, pp. 130-140.
7. National, Health and Medical Research Council. (2000). In How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. Canberra: Biotext.
8. Tate, R. L. and Perdices, M. and McDonald, S. and Togher, L. and Moseley, A. and Winders, K. and (2004) Development of a database of rehabilitation therapies for the psychological consequences of acquired brain impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, pp. 517-534.
9. Tate, R. L. and Togher, L. and Perdices, M. and McDonald, S. and Moseley, A. (2005a) Determining the methodological quality of single-case experimental designs in neuropsychological rehabilitation research. Paper presented at the 2005 International Neuropsychological Society mid-year meeting, Dublin. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11. (Suppl. 2), 78
10. Tate, R. L. and Togher, L. and Perdices, M. and McDonald, S. and Moseley, A. and Winders, K. and (2005b) Empirical evidence for rehabilitation therapies targeting the psychological consequences of acquired brain impairment: A survey of reports indexed on PsycBITETM. Brain Injury, 19(Suppl), pp. 32. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment and the World Congress on Brain Injury, 2005 Melbourne
11. Togher, L. and McDonald, S. and Code, C. and Grant, S. (2004a) Training the communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: A randomised control study. Aphasiology, 18, pp. 313-355.
12. Togher, L. and Tate, R. and McDonald, S. and Perdices, M. and Moseley, A. (2004b) Which treatment works? Accessing the best available evidence is now easier than you think! ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 6, pp. 85-88.