Response to open peer commentaries on "an open letter to institutional review boards considering Northfield laboratories' PolyHeme® trial": The emergency exception and unproven/unsatisfactory treatment [3]

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Kipnis, Ken ^a   King, Nancy M P ^b   Nelson, Robert M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745070189     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160600686422     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. Derse, A. R. 2006. Emergency research and consent: Keeping the exception from undermining the rule. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 36-37.
2. Holloway, K. F. C. 2006. Accidental communities: Race, emergency medicine, and the problem of PolyHeme®. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 7-17.
3. Kipnis, K., N. M. P. King, and R. M. Nelson. 2006 Trials and errors: Barriers to oversight of research conducted under the Emergency Research Consent Waiver. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 28(1): in press.
4. Lunstroth, J. 2006. Acting out of ethics: What the open letter asks. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 41-43.
5. Mann, H. 2006. How confidential trial negotiations and agreements between the FDA and sponsors marginalize local IRBs, and what to do about it. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 22-24.
6. Orr, R. D. 2006. Rules is rules. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 40-41.
7. Richardson, L. D., R. Rhodes, D. F. Ragin, and I. Wilets. 2006. The role of community consultation in the ethical conduct of research without consent. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 33-35.
8. Silbergleit, R., D. Watters, and M. R. Sayre. 2006. What treatments are "satisfactory"? Divining regulatory intent and an ethical basis for exception to informed consent for emergency research. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 24-26.
9. Sloan, E. P., M. Koenigsberg, D. Gens, M. Cipolle, J. Runge, M. N. Mallory, and G. Rodman Jr. 1999. Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) in the treatment of severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock: A randomized controlled efficacy trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 282(19): 1857-1864.
10. Spellecy, R. 2006. Unproven or unsatisfactory vs. equipoise in emergency research with waived consent. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 44-45.
11. Watters, D., M. R. Sayre, and R. Silbergleit. 2005. Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent. Academic Emergency Medicine 12: 1040-1044.