The foundations for a regional information system based on a reference register

Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 154-164

  Jaatinen, Pekka T ^a   Aarnio, Pertti ^a   Asikainen, Paula ^a  

^a SATAKUNTA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33745068704     PISSN: 1479649X     EISSN: 1479649X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Nielsen JD, Palshof T, Mainz J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 263-72.
2. Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA. Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Pract 1996; 13:264-79.
3. Mitchell K. Shared care: the way forward for patient-orientated follow-up care in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 457-58.
4. Gilbert M, Vael T, Vandenberghe A, Gerard P. Online health networks. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 93: 137-44.
5. Tsiknakis M, Katehakis DG, Orphanoudakis SC. An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information networks. Int J Med Inform 2002; 68: 3-26.
6. Kvamme OJ, Olesen F, Samuelson M. Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice (EQuiP). Quality in Health Care 2001;10:33-9.
7. Nelson R. Computerized patient records improve practice efficiency and patient care. Healthc Financ Manage 1998; 52: 86, 88.
8. Bruun-Rasmussen M, Bernstein K, Chronaki C. Collaboration: a new IT-service in the next generation of regional health care networks. Int J Med Inform 2003; 70: 205-14.
9. Garrido T, Jamieson L, Zhou Y, Wiesenthal A, Liang L. Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ 2005; 330: 581.
10. Harris CM, Burns J, Gregorich T, Kall G, Piar PM, Miller HD, et al. Managing technology in a complex healthcare delivery system. J Healthc Inf Manag 2003; 17: 37-41.
11. Rotonen M, Ruotsalainen P, Kaskihalme A, Aarnio M. Sharing electronic medical record on the WWW using InterCare architecture and smart cards. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999: 538-42.
12. Brelstaff G, Moehrs S, Anedda P, Tuveri M, Zanetti G. Internet patient records: new techniques. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2001: Article e8.
13. Kerkri EM, Quantin C, Grison T, Yetongnon K. A methodology for multi-source Record Linkage. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 275-80.
14. Mykkanen J, Porrasmaa J, Rannanheimo J, Korpela M. A process for specifying integration for multi-tier applications in healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2003; 70: 173-82.
15. Chu S. Implement Health Event Summary Using Clinical Document Architecture: The Application of Clinical Process Analysis Methodology. J Inf Techn Healthcare 2003; 1: 279-96.
16. Lynton-Moll C. Supporting eHealth Messaging Standards: Meeting the Challenge of Conformance Testing. J Inf Techn Healthcare 2005; 3: 211-17.
17. Vehviläinen A, Kumpusalo E, Kivelä S-L, Takala JK. Epikriisit sairaaloista ennen valtionosuusuudistusta ja sen jälkeen. In Finnish. [Referral feedbacks before and after reform of state subsidy] Suomen Lääkärilehti [Finnish Medical Journal] 1999; 54: 1871-75.