Evaluation culture: A definition and analysis of its development within organisations

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 43-47

  Owen, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745066903     PISSN: 1035719X     EISSN: 25159372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0300300107     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brinkerhoff R., 1989, ‘Evaluating training in business and industry’, New Directions in Program Evaluation, no. 44 (Winter, 1989), pp. 5–19
2. Caldwell B., & Spinks J., 1992, Leading the self managing school, Falmer Press, London
3. Campbell P., 1994, Whose knowledge is it? Involving teachers in the generation and using of information on educational innovations, USOE/OERI, Washington DC
4. Compton D.W., Baizerman M., & Heuftle Stockdill S., 2002, The art, craft and science of evaluation capacity building, Jossey Bass, San Francisco
5. Cousins J.B., & Earl L.M., 1992, ‘The case for participatory evaluation’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 397–418
6. Guskey T.R., 1986, ‘Staff development and the process of change’, Educational Researcher, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 5–13
7. Hall G.E., & Loucks S.F., 1979, Innovation configuration: analysing the adaptations of innovations, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
8. Havelock R.G., 1971, Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge, Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Ann Arbor, Michigan
9. Holbrook A., Ainley J., Bourke S., Owen J.M., McKenzie P., Misson S., & Johnson T., 2000, ‘Mapping educational research and its impact on Australian schools, in Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, The impact of educational research, Higher Education Division, DETYA, Canberra, pp. 15–278
10. Huberman M., 1994, ‘Research utilization: the state of the art’, Knowledge and Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 13–33
11. Kaplan R.S., & Norton D.P., 1996, The balanced scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA
12. Kennedy M.M., 1983, ‘Working knowledge’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 193–211
13. Louis K.S., 1998, ‘Reconnecting knowledge utilization and school improvement: two steps forward, one step back’, in Hargreaves A, Lieberman A, Fullan M, & Hopkins D, (eds), International handbook of educational change, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, vol. 2, pp. 1074–1095
14. Love A., 1994, ‘Internal evaluation: building organisations from within’, paper presented at International Conference of the Australasian Evaluation Society, Australasian Evaluation Society, Canberra
15. Owen J.M., & Lambert F.C., 1998, ‘Evaluation and the information needs of organisational Leaders’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 355–365
16. Owen J.M., Lambert F.C., & Stringer W., 1994, ‘Acquiring knowledge of implementation and change: essential for program evaluators?’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 273–294
17. Owen J.M., & McDonald D.E., 1999, ‘Creating an evaluation culture in international development cooperation agencies’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 41–53
18. Owen J.M., & Rogers P., 1999, Program evaluation: forms and approaches, 2nd edn, Sage, London
19. Preskill H., & Torres R.T., 1996, ‘From evaluation to evaluative enquiry for organisational learning’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, Georgia, November
20. Rogers E.M., 1995, Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn, The Free Press, New York
21. Stake R., 1980, ‘Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation’, in Dockrell W.B., & Hamilton D, (eds), Rethinking educational research, Hodder and Stoughton, London, pp. 72–87
22. Watkins J., 1994, ‘A post modern critical theory of research use’, Knowledge and Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 55–77
23. Wingens M., 1993, ‘Towards a general utilization metaphor: a systems theory reformulation of the two-communities metaphor’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 27–42