The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations

Laterality

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 373-393

  Bourne, Victoria J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE FIXATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS; NEUROANATOMY; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RETINA FOVEA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BRAIN; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; SACCADES; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33745061958     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: 14640678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500600633982     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Annett, M. (1985) Left, right, hand and brain: The right-shift theory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
2. Banich, M. T. and Shenker, J. I. (1994) Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations Neuropsychology, 8, pp. 263- 277.
3. Batt, V. and Underwood, G. and Bryden, M. P. (1995) Inspecting asymmetric presentation of words differing in informational and morphemic structure Brain and Cognition, 49, pp. 202-223.
4. Beaumont, J. G. (1983) Methods for studying cerebral hemispheric function. In Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere. (pp. 114-146). London: Academic Press.
5. Belger, A. and Banich, M. T. (1998) Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: A computational perspective Neuropsychology, 12, pp. 380-398.
6. Bishop, D. V. M. and Ross, V. and Daniels, M. S. and Bright, P. (1996) The measurement of hand preference: A validation study comparing three groups of right-handers British Journal of Psychology, 87, pp. 269-285.
7. Bourne, V. J. & Hole, G. J. (in press). Lateralised repetition priming for familiar faces: Evidence for asymmetric interhemispheric cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1117-1133.
8. Bronstein, A. M. and Kennard, C. (1987) Predictive eye saccades are different from visually triggered saccades Vision Research, 27, pp. 517-520.
9. Brown, W. S. and Jeeves, M. A. and Dietrich, R. and Burnison, D. S. (1999) Bilateral field advantage and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission in commissurotomy and callosal agenesis Neuropsychologia, 37, pp. 1165-1180.
10. Bunt, A. H. and Minckler, D. S. and Johanson, G. W. (1977) Demonstration of bilateral projection of the central retina of the monkey with horseradish peroxidase neuronography Journal of Comparative Neurology, 17, pp. 619-630.
11. Carpenter, R. H. S. (1988) Movements of the eyes. London: Pion.
12. Carter, G. L. and Kinsbourne, M. (1979) The ontogeny of right cerebral lateralization of spatial mental set Developmental Psychology, 15, pp. 241-245.
13. Christman, S. (1990) Effects of luminance and blur on hemispheric asymmetries in temporal integration Neuropsychologia, 28, pp. 361-374.
14. Compton, R. (2002) Inter-hemispheric interaction facilitates face processing Neuropsychologia, 40, pp. 2409-2419.
15. Corballis, M. C. (1998) Interhemispheric neural summation in the absence of the corpus callosum Brain, 121, pp. 1795-1807.
16. Curcio, C. A. and Sloan, K. R. and Kalina, R. E. and Hendrickson, A. E. (1990) Human photoreceptor topography Journal of Comparative Neurology, 292, pp. 497-523.
17. De Renzi, E. and Faglioni, P. and Scotti, G. (1968) Tactile spatial impairment and unilateral cerebral damage Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 146, pp. 468-475.
18. De Renzi, E. and Spinnler, H. (1966) Facial recognition in brain-damaged patients. An experimental approach Neurology, 16, pp. 145-152.
19. Deruelle, C. and de Schonen, S. (1998) Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy? Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, pp. 535-554.
20. Dimond, S. and Beaumont, G. (1972) Processing in perceptual integration between the cerebral hemispheres British Journal of Psychology, 63, pp. 509-514.
21. Dorthe, N. J. and Blumenthal, T. D. and Jason, D. R. and Lantz, P. E. (1995) The use of next-of-kin in assessing handedness Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, pp.203-208.
22. Enns, J. T. and DiLollo, V. (2000) What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 345-352.
23. Eviatar Z. (1999) Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 498-515.
24. Felsten, G. and Wasserman, G. S. (1980) Visual masking: Mechanisms and theories Psychological Bulletin, 88, pp. 329-353.
25. Hardyck, C. and Chiarello, C. and Dronkers, N. F. and Simpson, G. V. (1985) Orienting attention within the visual fields: How efficient is interhemispheric transfer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, pp. 650-666.
26. Jones, B. and Santi, A. (1978) Lateral asymmetries in visual perception with or without eye movements Cortex, 14, pp. 164-168.
27. Jordan, T. R. and Patching, G. R. and Milner, A. D. (1998) Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instruction alone: Implications for studying cerebral asymmetry Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51, pp. 371-391.
28. Joynt, R. J. (1964) Paul Pierre Broca: His contribution to the knowledge of aphasia Cortex, 1, pp. 206-213.
29. Kahneman, D. (1968) Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking Psychological Bulletin, 70, pp. 404-425.
30. Kitterle, F. L. and Christman, S. and Hellige, J. B. (1990) Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies Perception and Psychophysics, 48, pp. 297-306.
31. Klein, D. and Moscovitch, M. and Vigna, C. (1976) Attentional mechanisms and perceptual asymmetries in tachistoscopic recognition of words and faces Neuropsychologia, 14, pp. 55-66.
32. Lamb, T. D. and Pugh, E. N. (2004) Dark adaptation and the retinoid cycle of vision Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 23, pp. 307-380.
33. Lavidor, M. and Ellis, A. W. (2003) Interhemispheric integration of letter stimuli presented foveally or extra-foveally Cortex, 39, pp. 69-83.
34. Leehay, S. C. and Carey, S. and Diamond, R. and Cahn, A. (1978) Upright and inverted faces: The right hemisphere knows the difference Cortex, 14, pp. 411-419.
35. Levy, J. and Trevarthen, C. (1976) Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, pp. 299-312.
36. Lindell, A. K. and Nicholls, M. E. R. (2003) Cortical representation of the fovea: Implications for visual half-field research Cortex, 39, pp. 111-117.
37. Luh, K. E. and Levy, J. (1995) Interhemispheric cooperation: Left is left and right is right, but sometimes the twain shall meet Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 1243-1258.
38. Marzi, C. A. and Berlucchi, G. (1977) Right visual field superiority for accuracy of recognition of famous faces in normals Neuropsychologia, 15, pp. 751-756.
39. Mohr, B. and Pulvermuller, F. and Mittelstadt, K. and Rayman, J. (1996) Multiple simultaneous presentation facilitates lexical processing Neuropsychologia, 34, pp. 1003-1013.
40. Mohr, B. and Pulvermuller, F. and Rayman, J. and Zaidel, E. (1994) Interhemispheric cooperation during lexical processing is mediated by the corpus-callosum: Evidence from the split-brain Neuroscience Letters, 181, pp. 17-21.
41. Mondor, T. A. and Bryden, M. P. (1992) On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual-field asymmetries Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, pp. 529-555.
42. Oldfield, R. C. (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia, 9, pp. 97-113.
43. Østerberg G. 1935 Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina Acta Opthalmologica 6 1-103
44. Papousek, I. and Schulter, G. (1999) Quantitative assessment of five behavioural laterality measures: Distributions of scores and intercorrelations among right-handers Laterality, 4, pp. 345-362.
45. Peters, M. and Murphy, K. (1992) Cluster analysis reveals at least three, and possibly five distinct handedness groups Neuropsychologia, 30(4), pp. 373-380.
46. Poffenberger, A. (1912) Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nervous centers Archives of Psychology, 23, pp. 1-73.
47. Posner, M. I. and Nissen, M. J. and Ogden, W. C. (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In Modes of perceiving and processing information. (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
48. Pujol, J. and Deus, J. and Losilla, J. M. and Capdevila, A. (1999) Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI Neurology, 52, pp. 1038-1043.
49. Pynte, J. and Kennedy, A. and Murray, W. S. (1991) Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, pp. 458-470.
50. Ransil, B. J. and Schachter, S. C. (1994) Test-retest reliability of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and Global Handedness preference measurements, and their correlation Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, pp. 1355-1372.
51. Rapaczynski, W. and Ehrlichman, H. (1979) Opposite visual hemifield superiorities in face recognition as a function of cognitive style Neuropsychologia, 17, pp. 645-652.
52. Ratcliff, R. (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers Psychological Bulletin, 114, pp. 510-532.
53. Ratinckx, E. and Brysbaert, M. and Vermeulen, E. (2001) CRT screens may give rise to biased estimates of interhemispheric transmission time in the Poffenberger paradigm Experimental Brain Research, 136, pp. 413-416.
54. Regan, D. and Beverley, K. I. (1983) Visual-fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 24, pp. 754-759.
55. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. and Nozawa, G. and Gazzaniga, M. S. and Hughes, H. C. (1995) Fate of neglected targets: A chronometric analysis of redundant target effects in the bisected brain Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 211-230.
56. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1990) Human motor control. New York: Academic Press.
57. Rovamo, J. and Virsu, V. (1979) An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor Experimental Brain Research, 37, pp. 495-510.
58. Schachter, S. C. (1994) Evaluating the Bryden-McManus-Bulman-Fleming critique of the Geschwind-Behan-Galaburda model of cerebral lateralization Brain and Cognition, 26, pp. 199-205.
59. Schweinberger, S. R. and Baird, L. M. and Blumler, M. and Kaufmann, J. M. and Mohr, B. (2003) Interhemispheric cooperation for face recognition but not for affective facial expressions Neuropsychologia, 41, pp. 407-414.
60. Stone, J. and Leicester, J. and Sherman, S. M. (1973) The naso-temporal division of the monkey's retina Journal of Comparative Neurology, 150, pp. 333-348.
61. Swets, J. A. and Dawes, R. M. and Monahan, J. (2000) Better decisions through science Scientific American, 283, pp. 82-87.
62. Terrace, H. S. (1959) The effects of retinal locus and attention on the perception of words Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, pp. 382-385.
63. Todd, J.W. (1912) Reaction to multiple stimuli. New York: The Science Press.
64. Van Kleek, M. H. (1989) Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies Neuropsychologia, 27, pp. 1165-1178.
65. Verdino, M. and Dingman, S. (1998) Two measures of laterality in handedness: The Edinburgh handedness inventory and the Purdue pegboard test of manual dexterity Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, pp. 476-478.
66. Weber, B. and Treyer, V. and Oberholzer, N. and Jaermann, T. and Boesiger, P. and Brugger, P. and (2005) Attention and interhemispheric transfer: A behavioral and fMRI study Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, pp. 113-123.
67. Weissmann, D. H. and Banich, M. T. (1999) Global-local inference modulated by communication between the hemispheres Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, pp. 283-308.
68. Weissmann, D. H. and Banich, M. T. (2000) The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks Neuropsychology, 14, pp. 41-59.
69. Westheimer, G. (1973) Saccadic eye movements. In The oculomotor system and brain functions. (pp. 59-77). Sevenoaks: Butterworth.
70. Wyatt, H. J. (1978) Nasotemporal overlap and visual field sparing Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 17, pp. 1128-1130.
71. Young, A. W. (1982) Methodological theoretical bases. In Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. (pp. 11-27). London: Academic Press.