A statistical comparison of MARYBLYT™ and Cougarblight with sensitivity analysis

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 704, Issue , 2006, Pages 171-176

  Dewdney, M M ^a   Turechek, W W ^b   Biggs, A R ^c  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b USDA ARS Bee Research Laboratory   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apple; Disease forecasting; Erwinia amylovora; Fire blight; Pear

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ERWINIA AMYLOVORA; MALUS X DOMESTICA; PYRUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 33745060477     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.704.21     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hughes, G. and Madden, L.V. 2003. Evaluating predictive models with application in regulatory policy for invasive weeds. Agricultural Systems 76(2):755-774.
2. Hughes, G., McRoberts, N. and Burnett, F.J. 1999. Decision-making and diagnosis in disease management. Plant Pathol. 48:147-153.
3. Metz, C.E. 1978. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine VIII(4):283-298.
4. Smith, T.J. 2002. Fire blight daily risk assessment model. Version 2002C (Celsius) [Web Page]. Available at: http://www.ncw.wsu.edu/treefruit/fireblight/ md198c.htm.
5. Steiner, P.W. and Lightner, G.W. 1996. MARYBLYT: A Predictive Program for Forecasting Fire Blight Diseases in Apples and Pears. Version 4.3 of copyrighted computer program ed. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
6. Vida, S. 2001. AccuROC for Windows 95/98/NT. Version 2.5 ed. Montréal, PQ, Canada: McGill University Health Centre.