Quantification of economic benefits of multifunctional land use - An empirical analysis among employees

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 69-81

  Rodenburg, Caroline A ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Ernst and Young International Location Advisory Services   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Multifunctional land use; Stated preference methods; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LAND USE PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 33745051821     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-005-9033-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boelen V.J.B., J.T.P.M. Joosten, 1986, Kantoornevencentra in Amsterdam: Effecten van kantoorverplaatsingen op woon-werk verkeer en luchpauzegedrag Scriptie Geografisch en Planologisch Instituut, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2. BRO (2003) Visie publieksvoorzieningen Zuidas, Vught
3. Bruinsma, F. and Rietveld, P. (1996) A Stated Preference Approach to Measure the Relative Importance of Location Factors, Discussion Paper 1996-134/5, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam
4. DRO [Municipality Amsterdam, Department of Spatial Planning], 2004, Visie Zuidas; stand van zaken 2004, Amsterdam
5. ter Hart, H.W. (1984) Office Employees: Missing Dimension in the Geography of Retailing, In: A Profile of Dutch Economic Geography (Eds, de Smidt, M. and Wever, E.), van Gorcum, Assen
6. Hart H.W. ter, F.M. Dieleman, 1982, Kantooremployees en het stadscentrum Ekonomisch-Geografisch Instituut, Universiteit van Amsterdam Amsterdam
7. Lambooy, J.G. (1996) The Urban Spatial Structure and Agglomeration Economies: Relations with Real Estate, Discussion Paper 1996-141/5, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam
8. Lie R., 1994, Economische Dynamiek en Toplocaties; locatiekarakteristiek en prijsontwikkeling van kantoren in een aantal grote Europese steden Tinbergen Institute Research Series no. 63, Thesis Publishers Amsterdam
9. Louviere J.J., H.J.P. Timmermans, 1990, Using Hierarchical Information Integration to Model Consumer Responses to Possible Planning Actions: Recreation Destination Choice IllustrationEnvironment and Planning A 22(4):291-309
10. Mitchell R.C., R.T. Carson, 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method Resources for the Future Washington, DC
11. Rodenburg, C.A. (2005) Measuring Benefits of Multifunctional Land Use; Stated Preference Studies on the Amsterdam Zuidas, Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
12. Ruijgrok, E.C.M. (2000) Valuation of Nature in Coastal Zones, Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
13. Witlox F., 1994, Discrete Choice Modelling in a Context of Spatial Choice Behaviour: A Survey Studiecentrum voor Economisch en Sociaal Onderzoek (SESO) Antwerpen