Promising results using the Hanna corneal trephine system in penetrating keratoplasty

Cornea

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 371-376

  Jacobsen, Nina ^a,b   Højgaard Olsen, Klavs ^a  

^a HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Graft survival; Penetrating keratoplasty; Visual outcome

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; DENMARK; EYE REFRACTION; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HANNA CORNEAL TREPHINE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMETRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; ORGAN DONOR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; CORNEA; CORNEA DISEASE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AGED; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33745050648     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214209.52694.04     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bock J. The jubilee of the first successful optic keratoplasty by Eduard Zirm. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1958;70(21):381-383.
2. Sit M, Weisbrod DJ, Naor J, et al. Corneal graft outcome study. Cornea. 2001;20(2):129-133.
3. Ehlers N. Corneal banking and grafting: the background to the Danish Eye Bank System, where corneas await their patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(6):572-578.
4. Altman DG. Analysis of survival times. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991:365-395.
5. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, et al. Conclusions of the corneal transplant follow up study. Collaborating Surgeons. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(8):631-636.
6. Williams KA, Muehlberg SM, Lewis RF, et al. Influence of advanced recipient and donor age on the outcome of corneal transplantation. Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(10):835-839.
7. Lim L, Pesudovs K, Coster DJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(6):1125-1131.
8. Sayegh FN, Ehlers N, Farah I. Evaluation of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Nine years follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1988;66(4):400-403.
9. Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Fagerholm P, et al. Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):174-180.
10. Olsen T, Ehlers N, Favini E. Long term results of corneal grafting in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1984;62(3):445-452.
11. Wilbanks GA, Cohen S, Chipman M, et al. Clinical outcomes following penetrating keratoplasty using the Barron-Hessburg and Hanna corneal trephination systems. Cornea. 1996;15(6):589-598.
12. Stechschulte SU, Azar DT. Complications after penetrating keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000;40(1):27-43.
13. Dolorico AMT, Tayyani R, Ong HV, et al. Shortterm and longterm visual and astigmatic results of an opposing 10-0 nylon double running suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(6):991-999.
14. Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Pfleger T, et al. Three-year clinical outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with the guided trephine system. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:666-673.