Defining the dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum: A modified Delphi study

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 155, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 137-144

  Clayton, R ^a   Perera, R ^b   Burge, S ^a  

^a CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Delphi; Dermatology; Teaching; Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; DERMATOLOGY; GRADUATE STUDENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS; CURRICULUM; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DERMATOLOGY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS;

EID: 33745048995     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07190.x     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. The General Medical Council Education Committee. Tomorrow's Doctors. Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council, 1993.
2. The General Medical Council Education Committee. Tomorrow's Doctors. Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council, 2002.
3. Robbins AS Beck JC. Guidelines for graduate medical education in geriatrics. J Med Educ 1982 57: 762 8.
4. Snow N Imbembo AL. Thoracic surgical content of an undergraduate surgical curriculum. Surgery 1986 100: 83 8.
5. Boath E Mucklow J Black P. Consulting the oracle: a Delphi study to determine the content of a postgraduate distance learning course in therapeutics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997 43: 643 7.
6. Goodman CM. The Delphi technique: a critique. J Adv Nurs 1987 12: 729 34.
7. BAUTOD. Teaching Recommendations - Undergraduate Dermatology in the UK. British Association of Dermatologists, 2000 ( http://www.bad.org.uk/healthcare/ academic/teaching/).
8. American Academy of Dermatology Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Education Task Force, Association of Professors of Dermatology. Medical Student Core Curriculum. American Academy of Dermatology, 2004 ( http://www.aad.org/ professionals/Residents/MedStudCoreCurr/).
9. Hartge P. Raising response rates: getting to yes. Epidemiology 1999 10: 105 7.
10. Barclay S Todd C Finlay I et al. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract 2002 19: 105 11.