![]() |
Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 290-291
|
Treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: The case against the male sling
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DEVICE INFECTION;
DEVICE REMOVAL;
DIAPER;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EROSION;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
MALE GENITAL SYSTEM DISEASE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSTATECTOMY;
PROSTHESIS;
REVIEW;
SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URETER REIMPLANTATION;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSTATECTOMY;
PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;
REOPERATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URINARY INCONTINENCE;
URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL;
|
EID: 33745047270
PISSN: 17434270
EISSN: 17434289
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0502 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (9)
|