Basic income, self-respect and reciprocity

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 143-158

  McKinnon, Catriona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745043946     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00243     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. J. Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press), p. 440.
2. J. Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press). pp. 92, 107, 443, 543-45
3. J. Rawls (1993) Political Liberalism (New York, Columbia University Press), pp. 106, 203, 318, 319.
4. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Chapter IX, §82, pp. 541-48.
5. J. Feinberg (1970) The nature and value of rights, Journal of Value Inquiry 4, pp. 243-60.
6. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 7.
7. J. Rawls (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press) as goods needed by citizens conceived of as free and equal persons living a complete life (pp. 57-8).
8. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 274. But note that Rawls does not rule out the possibility that alternative economic regimes may be better suited to achieve justice in particular sets of circumstances.
9. Rawls, Political Liberalism, pp. 181-2, n. 9.
10. P. Van Parijs (1991) Why surfers should be fed: the liberal case for an unconditional basic income, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, 4, pp. 101-31.
11. R. Dworkin (2000) Equality of resources, Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press), pp. 65-119.
12. G. A. Cohen (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice, Ethics, 99, pp. 906-44, p. 922.
13. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 141.
14. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 137.
15. M. Matravers (2002) Responsibility, luck, and the ‘equality of what?’ debate, Political Studies 50/2, pp. 508-72.
16. E. Anderson (1999) What is the point of equality?, Ethics, 109, pp. 287-337.
17. C. McKinnon and J. Moss ‘Mutual obligation’ and ‘New Deal’: illegitimate and unjustified?, work-in-progress.
18. McKinnon, C. (2002) Liberalism and the Defence of Political Constructivism (New York, Palgrave MacMillan).
19. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 440.
20. R. S. Dillon (ed) (1995) Dignity, Character and Self-Respect (New York, Routledge).
21. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 396.
22. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 440.
23. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pp. 92, 107, 443, 543-45
24. Rawls, Political Liberalism pp. 106, 203, 318, 319.
25. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 319.
26. J. Cohen (1989) Democratic equality, Ethics, 99, pp. 727-51.
27. R. Nozick (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford, Blackwell) pp. 26ff.
28. T. Paine (1987) Agrarian Justice (London, Penguin Books), p. 478.
29. J. Wolff (1998) Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, pp. 99-122.
30. Anderson, Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, p. 308.
31. Rawls, Political Liberalism, pp. 181-2, n. 9.
32. Van Parijs, Political Liberalism.
33. B. Jordan (2000) Justice and reciprocity, in C. McKinnon and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds), The Demands of Citizenship (New York and London, Continuum Publishing), pp. 51-70.
34. B. Mandeville (1988), The Fable of the Bees (Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Classics).
35. S. White (1997) Liberal equality, exploitation, and the case for an unconditional basic income, Political Studies, 45, 2, pp. 312-26, p. 318.
36. Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 16.
37. B. Barry (1997) The attractions of basic income, in J. Franklin (ed), Equality (London, IPPR)