Valsalva leak point pressure to determine internal sphincter deficiency in stress urinary incontinence

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 154-158

  Rodrigues, Paulo ^a,b   Afonso, Yuri ^a   Hering, Flavio O ^a   Campagnari, João C ^a   Azoubel, Alberto ^a  

^a HOSPITAL BENEFICÊNCIA PORTUGUESA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Incontinence; Urethra; Urine; Urodynamics; Valsalva's maneuver

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER SPHINCTER; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MONITORING; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINE CATHETER; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETHRA; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

EID: 33745042212     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000090880     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Goldman HB, Rackley RR, Appell RA: The in situ anterior vaginal wall sling: predictors of success. J Urol 2001;166:2259-2262.
2. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick ML, Wan J, et al: Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 1993;150:1452-1454.
3. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarkov P, Shull BL, Smith AR: The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-16.
4. Blaivas JC, Salinas J: Type III stress urinary incontinence: importance of proper diagnosis and treatment. Surg Forum 1984;35:473-478.
5. McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, O'Connell HE: Leak-point pressures. Urol Clin North Am 1996;23:253-261.
6. Lane TM, Shah PJR: Leak-point pressures. BJU Int 2000;86:942-946.
7. Peschers UM, Jundt K, Dimpfl T: Differences between cough and Valsalva leak-point pressure in stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:677-680.
8. Miklos JR, Sze EH, Karram MM: A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leakpoint pressures in women with stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:349-351.
9. Stilberg H, Larsson G, Victor A: Cough-induced leak-point pressure: a valid measure for assessing treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:1000-1004.
10. Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK: Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:557-561.
11. Maniam P, Goldman HB: Removal of transurethral catheter during urodynamics may unmask stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2002;167:2080-2084.
12. Baseman JG, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE: Effect of 6 Fr urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers. Urology 2002;59:843-846.
13. Rodrigues P, Skaff M, Hering F, Capaganri JC: Prospective study of the effect of the urethral catheter on the urinary flow rate in 104 women. Foz do Iguacu, XXIX Brazilian Meeting of Urology, 2004, abstract 495.
14. Majdar S, Balzarrro M, Appell RA, Tchetgen MB, Nelson D: Baseline abdominal pressure and Valsalva leak-point pressures - correlation with clinical and urodynamic data. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;22:2-8.
15. Koraitim M: Catheter as source of error in urodynamic study. Urology 1982;10:223-226.