Randomized controlled clinical trial in psychotherapy research: An epistemological controversy

Journal of Humanistic Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-335

  Freire, Elizabeth Schmitt ^a  

^a Delphos Institute   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Empirically supported treatments; Psychotherapy efficacy; Psychotherapy research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745015080     PISSN: 00221678     EISSN: 1552650X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022167806286276     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. American Psychological Association. (1995). Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychosocial aspects of physical disorders. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. American Psychologist, 57 (12). 1052-1059.
3. American Psychological Association. (2005). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. Retrieved September 16, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpstatement.pdf
4. Bohart, A. (2002). A passionate critique of empirically supported treatments and the provision of an alternative paradigm. In J. Watson, R. Goldman, & M. Warner (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the 21st century: Advances in theory, research and practice (pp. 258-277). Ross-on-Wye, United Kingdom: PCCS Books.
5. Bohart, A., O'Hara, M., & Leitner, L. (1998). Empirically violated treatments: Disenfranchisement of humanistic and other psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 141-157.
6. Bozarth, J. (2002). Empirically supported treatment: Epitome of the "Specificity Myth." In J. Watson, R. Goldman, & M. Warner (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the 21st century: Advances in theory, research and practice (pp. 182-203). Ross-on-Wye, United Kingdom: PCCS Books.
7. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chambless, D. L. (1996). In defense of dissemination of empirically supported psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 67, 491-501.
9. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, D. H. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.
10. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716.
11. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Johnson, S. B., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. Clinical Psychology, 49 (2). 5-14.
12. Elliot, R. (1998). Editor's introduction: A guide to the empirically-supported treatments controversy. Psychotherapy Research, 8 (2). 115-125.
13. Elliot, R. (2001). Hermeneutic single-case efficacy design: An overview. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology (pp. 315-324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Elliot, R. (2002). Research on the effectiveness of humanistic therapies: A meta-analysis. In D. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice (pp. 57-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Elliot, R., Greenberg, L. S., & Lietaer, G. (2004). Research on experiential psychotherapies. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 493-539). New York: John Wiley.
16. Feyerabend, P. (1970). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Theories & methods of physics and psychology: Minnesota studies for the philosophy of science (pp. 17-130). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Feyerabend, P. (1981). Realism, rationalism, and scientific method: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996). Should we allow psychotherapy research to determine clinical practice ? Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 3, 245-250.
19. Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York: Harper & Row.
20. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
21. Henry, W. P. (1998). Science, politics, and the politics of science: The use and misuse of empirically validated treatment research. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 126-140.
22. Kendal, P. C., Holmbeck, G., & Verduin, T. (2004). Methodology, design, and evaluation in psychotherapy research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 16-43). New York: John Wiley.
23. Kuhn, T. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 231-278). London: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). London: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lambert, M. J., Bergin, A. E., & Garfield, S. L. (2004). Introduction and historical overview. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 3-15). New York: John Wiley.
26. Lohr, J. M., Fowler, K. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). The dissemination and promotion of pseudoscience in clinical psychology: The challenge to legitimate clinical science. The Clinical Psychologist, 55, 4-10.
27. McFall, R. M. (1996). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75-88.
28. Nathan, P. E. (1996). Validated forms of psychotherapy may lead to better-validated psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 3, 251-255.
29. Persons, J. B., & Silberschatz, G. (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126-135.
30. Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31. Popper, K. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1959)
32. Preston, J. (2005). Paul Feyerabend. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr2005/entries/feyerabend/
33. Rennie, D. L. (1995). On the rhetorics of social science: Let's not conflate natural science and human science. The Humanistic Psychologist, 23, 321-332.
34. Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. F., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139-150.
35. Rowland, N., & Goss, S. (Eds.). (2000). Evidence-based counseling and psychological therapies: Research and applications. Philadelphia: Routledge.
36. Schneider, K. J. (2001). Multiple-case depth research: Bringing experience-near closer. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology (pp. 305-314). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Seligman, M. P., & Levant, R. (1998). Managed care policies rely on inadequate science. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 211-212.
38. Stiles, W. B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 439-458.
39. Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1989). Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 521-544.
40. Task Force for the Development of Practice Recommendations for the Provision of Humanistic Psychosocial Services. (2005). Recommended principles and practices for the provision of humanistic psychosocial services: Alternative to mandated practice and treatment guidelines. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/divisions/div32/pdfs/taskfrev.pdf
41. Wampold, B. E. (1997). Methodological problems in identifying efficacious psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 21-43.
42. Weisz, J. R., Hawley, K. M., Pilkonis, P. A., Woody, S. R., & Follette, W. C. (2000). Stressing the (other) three Rs in the search for empirically supported treatments: Review procedures, research quality, relevance to practice and the public interest. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7 (3). 243-258.
43. Wertz, F. J. (1982). The findings and value of a descriptive approach to everyday perceptual process. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 13, 169-195.