Challenges associated with privacy in health care industry: Implementation of HIPAA and the security rules

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-64

  Choi, Young B ^a   Capitan, Kathleen E ^a   Krause, Joshua S ^a   Streeper, Meredith M ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic data interchange (EDI); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); Protected health information (PHI); Security rule

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIVACY; COMPUTER SECURITY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RECORD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

COMPUTER SECURITY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH FACILITIES; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PRIVACY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745005507     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-006-7405-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Volonino L, Robinson SR (2004) Principles and practice of information security: Protecting computers from Hackers and Lawyers, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
2. Schneider J, Mercuri RT (2004) The HIPAA-potamus in health care data security. Commun ACM 47(7)
3. Federal Register: Rules and Regulations. 65(160), August 2000
4. Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) (2004) HIPAA Security White Papers
5. Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) (2004) Security and Privacy Workgroup Introduction
6. Washington District of Colombia Department of Health. Retreived September 17, 2005 at http://dchealth.dc.gov/hipaa/hipaaps.shtm.
7. Kaufman JH, Edlund S, Ford DA (2002) The social contract core. Honolulu, HI, USA
8. Hagland M. Customized automation: OB/GNY practices are finding EMR systems designed specifically for them. Healthcare Informatics Online, March 2004. Available at http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/issues/2004/03_04/ specialty.htm.
9. Hooda JS, Dogdu E, Sunderraman RJ (2004) Health level-7 compliant clinical patient records system. Commun ACM 47(7)
10. Goldberg IV (2000) Electronic medical records and patient privacy. Health Care Manager 18:3
11. Eddy AC (2000) Annals of health law, Annual 2000 v9 p 1-72, A Critical Analysis of Health and Human Services' Proposed Health Privacy Regulations in Light of the Health Insurance Privacy and Accountability Act of 1996
12. Essex D. The many layers of workflow automation. Healthcare Informatics Online, June 2000. Available at http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/issues/ 2000/06_00/essex.htm
13. Massachusetts poised to become first state with electronic medical records. Associated Press, Boston Herald.com, December 2004. Available at http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=57497
14. Brewin B. Electronic health records spread. Federal Computer Weekly, December 2004. Available at http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/1206/web-ehr- 12-07-04.asp
15. Panko R (2005) Business Data Networks and Telecommunications, 5th edn., Prentice Hall, Inc., NJ
16. Panko R (2004) Corporate Computer and Network Security, Prentice Hall Inc., NJ
17. Onam PW, Hanebutte N (2005) Fundamentals - and Beyond-of Computer & Network Security. Powerpoint Slides from Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikola, Hawaii
18. Masys DR (2002) Effects of Current and Future Information Technologies on The Health Care Workforce: Health Care Professionals are Asuming the Role of "Tech Support" in Explaining Medical Terms to Internet-savvy Patient-Consumers, The People-To-People Health Foundation Inc.
19. Krulwich AS, McDonald BL (2001) The vulnerability of HIPAA regulations to first and fourth amendment attack: An addendum to "evolving constitutional privacy doctrines affecting healthcare enterprises." Food Drug Law J 56
20. Choi YB, Seo H, Blackburn JM (2005) A quantification model using P3P in privacy control for telecommunications service management. Int J Serv Stand, 1(4); pp 426-445.