Gender meets the Usage-Based Model: Four principles of rule interaction in gender assignment

Lingua

Volumn 116, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1369-1393

  Nesset, Tore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cognitive linguistics; Gender assignment; Usage Based Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744994797     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aronoff M. Morphology by Itself (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London/England
2. In: Barlow M., and Kemmer S. (Eds). Usage based Models of Language (2000), CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
3. Bybee J. Phonology and Language Use (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Comrie B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. second ed. (1989), Blackwell, Oxford/UK/Cambridge/USA
5. Corbett G.G. Gender (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Corbett G.G., and Fraser N.M. Gender assignment: a typology and a model. In: Senft G. (Ed). Systems of Nominal Classification (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 293-325
7. Corbett G.G., and Fraser N.M. Default genders. In: Unterbeck B., and Rissanen M. (Eds). Gender in Grammar and Cognition (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 55-97
8. Dahl O. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In: Unterbeck B., and Rissanen M. (Eds). Gender in Grammar and Cognition (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 99-115
9. Dobrin, L.M., 1997. The morphosyntactic reality of phonological form. In: Booij, G., van Marle, J. (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1997. pp. 59-81.
10. Dobrin, L.M., 1999. Phonological form, morphological class, and syntactic gender: the noun class systems of Papua New Guinea Arapeshan. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
11. Doleschal, U., 1993. Genus als grammatische und textlinguistische kategorie. Eine kognitiv-funktionalistische Unterscuchung des Russischen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.
12. Doleschal U. Gender assignment revisited. In: Unterbeck B., and Rissanen M. (Eds). Gender in Grammar and Cognition (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 117-165
13. Enger H.-O. Stundom er ein sigar berre ein sigar. Maal og Minne 2 (2002) 135-151
14. Fortune, R., 1942. Arapesh. J.J. Augustin Publisher, New York (Reprinted 1977 by AMS Press, New York).
15. Fraser N.M., and Corbett G.G. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 103 (1997) 25-57
16. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind (1987), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
17. Kiparsky P. Explanation in Phonology (1982), Foris, Dordrecht
18. Köpcke K.-M. Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (1982), Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen
19. Köpcke K.-M., and Zubin D. Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweizung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93 (1984) 26-51
20. Köpcke K.-M., and Zubin D. Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. In: Lang E., and Zifonum G. (Eds). Deutsch-Typologisch (1995), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 473-491
21. Koutsoudas A., Sanders G., and Noll C. The application of phonological rules. Language 50 1 (1974) 1-28
22. Kumashiro, F., 2000. Phonotactic interactions: a non-reductionist approach to phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
23. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things (1987), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
24. Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By (1981), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
25. Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh (1999), Basic Books, New York
26. Langacker R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. 1 (1987), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
27. Langacker R.W. Concept, Image, and Symbol (1991), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York
28. Langacker R.W. Grammar and Conceptualization (1999), Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter
29. Mater E. Rückläufiges Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (1970), Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig
30. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of Speech Perception. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 1-86
31. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 1993. Optimality theory. constraint interaction in generative grammar. Report no. RuCCS-TR-2, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
32. Pugh, S.M., Press, I., 1999. Ukrainian. A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London and New York.
33. Rice, C., 2002. Optimizing gender. Paper presented at the conference "The Grammar of Gender", Oslo, November 28-29, 2002.
34. Steinmetz D. Two principles and some rules for gender in German: inanimate nouns. Word 37 (1986) 189-217
35. Steinmetz, D., 2002. Gender shifts in Germanic and slavic. Paper presented at the conference "The Grammar of Gender", Oslo, November 28-29, 2002.
36. Trosterud T. Genustilordning i norsk er regelstyrt. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 19 (2001) 29-57