|
|
Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 138-147
|
|
What is the best method for assessing the rate of wound healing? A comparison of 3 mathematical formulas.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANTHROPOMETRY;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INJURY;
MATHEMATICS;
METHODOLOGY;
NURSING;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
PATHOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
REVIEW;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
TIME;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
ANTHROPOMETRY;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
HUMANS;
MATHEMATICS;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
WOUNDS AND INJURIES;
|
|
EID: 33744987437
PISSN: 15277941
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200604000-00009 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (42)
|
|
References (40)
|
