Weak coupling of the symmetric galerkin BEM with FEM for potential and elastostatic problems

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-80

  Springhetti, R ^a   Novati, G ^a   Margonari, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b Structural Department   (Italy)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Symmetric Galerkin boundary element method; Weak coupling

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; ELASTOPLASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GALERKIN METHODS;

3D ELASTOPLASTIC PROBLEMS; CONTINUITY CONDITIONS; SYMMETRIC GALERKIN BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; WEAK COUPLING;

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS;

EID: 33744985304     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bonnet M. (1995): Regularized direct and indirect symmetric variational BIE formulations for three-dimensional elasticity. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., vol. 15, pp. 93-102.
2. Bonnet M.; Maier G.; Polizzotto C. (1998): Symmetric Galerkin boundary element method. Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 669-704.
3. Elleithy W.M.; Tanaka M. (2003): Interface relaxation algorithms for BEM-BEM coupling and FEM-BEM coupling. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., vol. 192, pp. 2977-2992.
4. Forth S.C.; Staroselsky A. (2005): A hybrid FEM/BEM approach for designing an aircraft engine structural health monitoring. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 287-298.
5. Frangi A.; Novati G.; Springhetti R.; Rovizzi M. (2002): 3D fracture analysis by the symmetric Galerkin BEM. Comput. Mech., vol. 28, pp. 220-232.
6. Frangi A.; Novati G. (2003): BEM-FEM coupling for 3D fracture mechanics applications. Comput. Mech., vol. 32, pp. 415-422.
7. Ganguly S.; Layton J.B.; Balakrishna C. (2000): Symmetric coupling of multi-zone curved Galerkin boundary elements with finite elements in elasticity. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 48, pp. 633-654.
8. Ganguly S.; Layton J.B.; Balakrishna C. (2004): A coupling of multi-zone curved Galerkin BEM with finite elements for independently modelled sub-domains with non-matching nodes in elasticity. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 59, pp. 1021-1038.
9. Haas M.; Kuhn G. (2003): Mixed-dimensional, symmetric coupling of FEM and BEM. Eng. Anal. Bound. Eton., vol. 27, pp. 575-582.
10. Han Z.D.; Atluri S.N. (2002): SGBEM (for cracked local subdomain) - FEM (for uncracked global structure) alternating method for analyzing 3D surface cracks and their fatigue-growth. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 699-716.
11. Han Z.D.; Atluri S.N. (2003): On simple formulations of weakly-singular traction & displacement BIE, and their solutions through Petrov-Galerkin approaches. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-20.
12. Keat W.D.; Annigeri B.S.; Cleary M.P. (1988): Surface integral and finite element hybrid method for two and three dimensional fracture mechanics analysis. Int. J. Fract., vol. 36, pp. 35-53.
13. Li S.; Mear M.E.; Xiao L. (1998): A hybrid coupled finite-boundary element method in elasticity. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., vol. 151, no. 3-4, pp. 435-459.
14. Lubliner J. (1990): Plasticity theory, Macmillan Publishing Company.
15. Polizzotto C.; Zito M. (1994): Variational formulations for coupled BE/FE methods in elastostatics. ZAMM, vol. 74, pp. 533-543.
16. Sauter S.A.; Schwab C. (1997): Quadrature for hp-Galerkin BEM in 3-d. Num. Math., vol. 78, pp. 211-258.
17. Simo J.C.; Hughes T.J.R. (1998): Computational inelasticity, Springer, ed. Marsden, Wiggins, Sirovich.
18. Sirtori S.; Maier G.; Novati G.; Miccoli S. (1992): A Galerkin symmetric boundary-element method in elasticity: formulation and implementation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 35, pp. 255-282.
19. Zienkiewicz O.C.; Kelly D.W.; Bettes P. (1977): The coupling of the finite elements and boundary solution procedures. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 11, pp. 355-375.