Repeatability and agreement of two A-scan ultrasonic biometers and IOLMaster in non-orthokeratology subjects and post-orthokeratology children

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 160-168

  Chan, Ben ^a   Cho, Pauline ^a   Cheung, Sin Wan ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

A scan ultrasonic biometer; Anterior chamber depth; Axial length; Children; IOLMaster; Orthokeratology

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MYOPIA; OBSERVER VARIATION; SPECTACLES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; CHILD; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MYOPIA; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 33744984829     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00029.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams AJ. Axial length elongation, not corneal curvature, as a basis of adult onset myopia Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:150-152.
2. Grosvenor T. High axial length/corneal radius ratio as a risk factor in the development of myopia Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:689-696.
3. Hosaka A. The growth of the eye and its components Japanese studies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1988;185:65-68.
4. Lam CS, Goh WS. The incidence of refractive errors among school children in Hong Kong and its relationship with the optical components Clin Exp Optom 1991;74:97-103.
5. Grosvenor T, Scott R. Three-year changes in refraction and its components in youthonset and early adult-onset myopia Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:677-683.
6. Lin LL, Shih YF, Lee YC, Hung PT, Hou PK. Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students-a 5-year longitudinal study Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:495-498.
7. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig T, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:257-263.
8. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765-773.
9. Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Frisch IB, Auffarth GU. Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II Topography System J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2115-2121.
10. Storey JK, Rabie EP. Ultrasound-a research tool in the study of accommodation Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1983;3:315-320.
11. Perez-Gomez I, Hollingsworth J, Efron N. Effects of benoxinate hydrochloride 0.4% on the morphological appearance of the cornea using confocal microscopy Contact Lens Ant Eye 2004;27:45-48.
12. Norden LC. Adverse reactions to topical ocular anesthetics J Am Optom Assoc 1976;47:730-733.
13. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, Schild G, Rainer G, Maca S, Petternel V, Lackner B, Drexler W. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1950-1955.
14. Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, Dolezal C, Skorpik F, Juchem M, Fercher AF, Gnad HD. Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1886-1893.
15. Tehrani M, Krummenauer F, Blom E, Dick HB. Evaluation of the practicality of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound in 253 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:741-746.
16. Foster PJ, Alsbirk PH, Baasanhu J, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Anterior chamber depth in Mongolians: variation with age, sex, and method of measurement Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:53-60.
17. Carkeet A, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Tang W, Tan DT. Repeatability of IOLMaster biometry in children. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:829-834.
18. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:524-534. (Pubitemid 28475916)
19. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Kiss B, Sacu S, Petternel V, Drexler W. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurement methods in phakic and pseudophakic eyes J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:89-94.
20. Hitzenberger CK. Optical measurement of the axial eye length by laser Doppler interferometry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:616-624.
21. Sheng H, Bottjer CA, Bullimore MA. Ocular component measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:27-34.
22. Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PCK. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:477-483.
23. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:458-462.
24. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1961-1968.
25. Rudnicka AR, Steele CF, Crabb DP, Edgar DF. Repeatability, reproducibility and intersession variability of the Allergan Humphrey ultrasonic biometer Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1992;70:327-334.
26. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:85-88.
27. Gao L, Zhuo X, Kwok AK, Yu N, Ma L, Wang J. The change in ocular refractive components after cycloplegia in children Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002;46:293-298.
28. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:252-259.
29. Coon LJ. Orthokeratology. Part II: Evaluating the Tabb method. J Am Optom Assoc 1984;55:409-418.
30. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:791-799.
31. Sridharan R, Swarbrick H. Corneal response to short-term orthokeratology lens wear Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:200-206.
32. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2518-2523.
33. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. Longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: A pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control Curr Eye Res 2005;30:71-80.
34. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards MH. Practice of orthokeratology by a group of contact lens practitioners in Hong Kong-Part 1 General overview. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:365-371.
35. Efron N. Clinical application of grading scales for contact lens complication Optician 1997; 213 (5604) : 25-35.
36. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986; 1 (8476) : 307-310.
37. Longstaff S. Factors affecting intraocular lens power calculation Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1986;105:642-646.
38. Tehrani M, Krummenauer F, Kumar R, Dick HB. Comparison of biometric measurements using partial coherence interferometry and applanation ultrasound J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:747-752.
39. Ferrara G, Cennamo G, Marotta G, Loffredo E. New formula to calculate corneal power after refractive surgery J Refract Surg 2004;20:465-471.