|
Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 585-626
|
A critique of the motivational analysis in wrongful conception cases.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CHILD;
CHILD REARING;
CHILD WELFARE;
COMPENSATION;
CONTRACEPTION;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MALPRACTICE;
MOTIVATION;
PARENT;
POLICY;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
UNITED STATES;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
CHILD;
CHILD REARING;
CHILD, UNWANTED;
COMPENSATION AND REDRESS;
HUMANS;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MALPRACTICE;
MOTIVATION;
PARENTS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
STERILIZATION, REPRODUCTIVE;
UNITED STATES;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
|
EID: 33744979751
PISSN: 01616587
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|