A review of the use of compensated gross tonnes for shipbuilding performance measurement

Journal of Ship Production

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 99-104

  Bruce, George J ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DATA PROCESSING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WARSHIPS;

COMPENSATED GROSS TONNES (CGT); ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC AND CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT (OECD); SHIP CONSTRUCTION COSTS;

SHIPBUILDING;

EID: 33744976139     PISSN: 87561417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. BIRMINGHAM, R., ET AL. 1997 Shipyard technology development strategies. JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, November.
2. BRUCE, G., AND CLARK, J. 1992 Productivity measures as a tool for performance improvement, RINA Spring Meeting, April.
3. COMMISSION FOR THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. 1992 Report of a Study Into the Competitiveness of European Community Shipyards, KPMG, October.
4. CRAGGS, J., BLOOR, D., TANNER, B., AND BULLEN, H. 2004 Naval compensated gross tonnage coefficients and shipyard learning, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 20, 2, 107-113.
5. LAMB, T., AND HELLESOY, A. 2002 A shipbuilding productivity predictor, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 18, 2, 79-85.
6. OECD. 1984, 1991 New Compensated Gross Tonnage Coefficients, Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development.