Political processes in management, organization and the social shaping of technology

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-15

  Dawson, Patrick ^a   Clausen, Christian ^b   Nielsen, Klaus T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744975548     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095373200107201     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. The workshop was organized and funded by the Danish Research Programme's: 'Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology' Management-CISTEMA-DTU' at the Technical University of Denmark, and 'Working Environment and Technological Development-AMOTEK' at Roskilde University, Aalborg University and Technical University of Denmark. These Research Programmes were sponsored by the Danish Research Councils and the Danish Working Environment Fund.
2. On Denmark, see J. Due, C. S. Jensen & L. K. Peterscn, The Suniml of the Danish Model: A Historical Sociological Analysis of the Danish System of Collective Bargaining (Copenhagen, Juristog okonomforbundets forlag, 1994);
3. on Sweden, see A. Sandberg et al., Technological Change and Co-determination in Sweden (Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press, 1992).
4. K. H. Sorcnsen, 'A Sociotechnical Legacy? A Note on Trajectories and Traditions in Norwegian Research on Technology and Work', in: K. H. Sorensen (Ed.), The Spectre of Participation: Technology and Work in a Welfare State (Oslo, Scandinavian University Press, 1998), p. 1.
5. C. Clausen & P. L. Jensen, 'Action-oriented Approaches to Technology Assessment and Working Life in Scandinavia', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5, 2, 1993, pp. 83-97.
6. R. Blauner, Alienation and Freedom (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1964).
7. J. Woodward, Management and Technology (London, HMSO, 1958).
8. H. Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York, Monthly Review Press, 1974).
9. A. Friedman, Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism (London, Macmillan, 1977)
10. A. Friedman, 'Managerial Strategies, Activities, Techniques and Technology', in: D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds), Labour Process Theory (Houndmills, Macmillan, 1990)
11. M. Burawoy, Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labour Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1979)
12. H. Kern, Horst & M. Schumann, Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? (München, C. H. Beck, 1984)
13. M. Piore & C. F. Säbel, The Second Industrial Diiide (New York, Basic Books, 1984).
14. B. Wilkinson, The Shopflooor Politics of new Technology (London, Heinemann Educational Books, 1983).
15. Wilkinson, op. cit., Ref. 9, p. 96.
16. E. Hildebrandt & R. Seltz, Handel betrieblicher Soziakerfassung durch systemische Kontrolle? (Berlin, Ed. Sigma, 1989).
17. J. Pfeffer, Power in Organizations (Boston, Pitman, 1981);
18. J. Pfeffer, ^Managing with Power (Boston MA, Harvard University Press, 1994);
19. A. M. Pettigrew, The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985).
20. P. Dawson, Organizational Change: A Processual Perspective (London, Paul Chapman, 1994).
21. D. Knights & F. Murray, Managers Divided (New York, Wiley, 1994).
22. M. Alvesson et ai, Making Sense of Management. A Critical Introduction (London, Sage, 1996).
23. R. Williams & D. Edge, 'The Social Shaping of Technology', Research Policy, 25, 1996, pp. 865-899;
24. C. Clausen & C. Koch, 'The Role of Spaces and Occasions in the Transformation of Information Technologies-Lessons from the Social Shaping of IT Systems for Manufacturing in a Danish Context', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11, 3, 1999, pp. 463-82.
25. W. E. Bijker, Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Soda-technical Change (Cambridge Mass., MIT Press, 1995).
26. K. Grint & S. Woolgar, The Machine at Work (Oxford, Polity Press, 1997), p.10.
27. Bijker, op. cit., Ref. 17.
28. M. Gallon, 'Actor-Network Theory-The Market Test', in: J. I.aw &J. Hassard (Eds), Actor Network Theory and After (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1999).
29. B. Latour, 'On Recalling ANT', in: J. Law &J. Hassard (Eds), Actor Network Theory and After (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1999).
30. Ibid.
31. J. Law &J. Hassard (Eds), Actor Network Theory and After (Oxford, Black-well Publishers, 1999).
32. Woodward, op. cit., Réf. 6.
33. C. Perrow, 'A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations', American Sociological Renew, 32, 1967, pp. 194-208.
34. T. Pinch & W. Bijker, 'The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other', in: W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: Xew Directions in the Sociology of History and [Copy missing] (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1987).
35. W. Orlikowski, 'The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations', Organization Science, 3, 3, 1992, pp. 398-427.
36. A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structure (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1984).
37. Bijker, op. cit., Réf. 17.
38. W. J. Orlikowski & D. J. Gash, 'Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organisations', ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 2, 1994, pp. 174-207.
39. Hildcbrandt & Seltz, op. cit., Réf. 11.
40. Ibid.
41. Bijker, op. cit., Ref. 17, p. 273.
42. A. L. Strauss, Continual Permutations of Action (New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 1993).
43. A. L. Strauss, Continual Permutations of Action Ibid.