Durability of polymer-ceramics composite implants determined in creep tests

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 11-12, 2006, Pages 1615-1622

  Chlopek, J ^a   Rosol, P ^a   Morawska Chochol, A ^a  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

A. Polymer matrix composites; B. Creep; B. Durability; B. Mechanical properties; D. Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVES; AGING OF MATERIALS; CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES; CREEP TESTING; DURABILITY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MICROSTRUCTURE; POLYMERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; COMPOSITE IMPLANTS; MECHANICAL STRESSES; POLYMER-MATRIX COMPOSITES;

NONMETALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES;

CERAMIC MATRIX; COMPOSITE; CREEP; DURABILITY; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL PROPERTY;

EID: 33744975051     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hench L.L. Biomaterials: a forecast for the future. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 1419-1423
2. Cao W., and Hench L.L. Bioactive materials. Ceramics Int 22 (1996) 493-507
3. ®/high density polyethylene composite as a new soft tissue bonding material. Bioceramics 8 (1995) 383-388
4. Evans S.L., and Gregson P. Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 1330-1342
5. Ramakrishna S., Mayer J., Wintermantel E., and Kam W. Leong, Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Comp Sci Tech 61 (2001) 1189-1224
6. Chłopek J., and Kmita G. Non-metallic composite materials for bone surgery. Eng Trans 2,3 51 (2003) 307-323
7. Wenz L.M., Merritt K., Brown S.A., and Moet A. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Mater Res 24 (1990) 207
8. Chłopek J., Kmita G., and Rosół P. Life time of polymeric composite implants on the basis creep and fatigue tests. Ann Transplant 9 (2004) 26-29
9. Bonfield W., Grynpas M.D., Tully A.E., Bowman J., and Abram J. Hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene a mechanically compatible implant material for bone replacement. Biomaterials 2 (1981) 185-186
10. Swain R.E., Wang M., Beale B., and Bonfield W. HAPEX™ for otologic applications. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 11 (1999) 315-320
11. Abu Bakar M.S., Cheng M.H.W., Tang S.M., Yu S.C., Liao K., Tan C.T., et al. Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 2245-2250
12. Boeree N., Dove J., Cooper J.J., Knowles J., and Hastings G.W. Developmant of a degradable composite for orthopaedic use - mechanical evaluation of an hydroxyapatite-polyhydroxybutyrate composite materials. Biomaterials 14 10 (1993) 793-796
13. Wang M., Yue C.Y., and Chua B. Production and evaluation of hydroxyapatite reinforced polysulfone for tissue replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12 (2001) 821-826
14. Shikinami Y., and Okuno M. Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly l-lactide (PLLA), Part II: practical properties of miniscrews and miniplates. Biomaterials 22 23 (2001) 3197-3211
15. Knowles J.L., and Hastings G.W. In vitro and in vivo investigation of a range of phosphate glass-reinforced polyhydroksybutyrate-based degradable composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 4 (1993) 102-106
16. ®/high density polyethylene composite as a new soft tissue bonding material. Bioceramics 8 (1995) 383-388
17. Abu Bakar M.S., Cheang P., and Khor K.A. Mechanical properties of injection molded hydroxyapatite-polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Comp Sci Tech 63 (2003) 421-425
18. Cheang P., and Khor K.A. Effect of particulate morphology on the tensile behaviour of polymer-hydroxyapatite composites. Mater Sci Eng A345 (2003) 47-54
19. Juhasz J.A., Best S.M., Brooks R., Kawashita M., Miyata N., Kokubo T., et al. Mechanical properties of glass-ceramic A-W-polyethylene composites: effect of filler content and particle size. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 949-955
20. Suwanprateeb J., Tanner K.E., Turner S., and Bonfield W. Influence of Ringer's solution on creep resistance of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8 (1997) 469-472
21. Zhang G., Latour Jr. R.A., Kennedy J.M., Del Schutte Jr. H., and Friedman R.J. Long-term compressive property durability of carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone composite in physiologic saline. Biomaterials 17 (1996) 781-789
22. Christel P., Claes L., and Brown S.A. Carbon reinforced composites in orthopedic surgery. In: Szycher M. (Ed). High performance biomaterials: a comprehensive guide to medical and pharmaceutical applications (1991), Technomic, Lancaster (USA) 499-518
23. Latour R.A., and Black J. Development of FRP composite structural biomaterials: fatigue strength of the fiber/matrix interfacial bond in simulated in vivo environments. J Biomed Mater Res 27 (1993) 1281-1291
24. Mano J.F., Sousa R.A., Boesel L.F., Neves N.M., and Reis R.L. Bioinert, biodegradable and injectable polymeric matrix composites for hard tissue replacement: state of the art and recent developments. Compos Sci Technol 64 (2004) 789-817
25. Magee F.P., Weinstein A.M., Longo J.A., Koeneman J.B., and Yapp R.A. A canine composite femoral stem: an in vivo study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 (1988) 237-252
26. Cieślik T., and Pogorzelska-Stronczak B. Kliniczna ocena płytek i śorub z materiału złożonego wȩgiel - wȩgiel stosowanych do zespolenia złamanej żuchwy. Czasopismo Stomatologiczne XLIX (1996) 559-562b [in Polish]