Transforming curriculum genres in urban schools: The political significance of collaborative classroom discourse

Transforming Literacy Curriculum Genres: Working With Teacher Researchers in Urban Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 325-334

  Pappas, Christine C ^a   Zecker, Liliana Barro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744973409     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410600776-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Almasi, J.F., McKeown, M.G., & Beck, I.L. (1996). The nature of engaged reading in classroom discussions of literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 107-146.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M.Bakhtin. M. Holquist (Ed.) & M.Holquist & C.Emerson (Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. C.Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), & V.W.McGee (Trans.). Austin: Austin University Press.
4. Barnes, D. (1992). From communication to curriculum (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
5. Barnes, D. (1993). Supporting exploratory talk for learning. In K.M.Pierce & C.J. Gilles (Eds.), Cycles of meaning: Eocploring the potential of talk in learning communities (pp. 17-34). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: Making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
7. Bartolome, L.I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173-194.
8. Bloome, D., & Bailey, F. (1992). Studying language and literacy through events, particularity, and intertextuality. In R.Beach, J.L.Green, M.L.Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 181-210). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
9. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 305-333.
10. Cazden, C.B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. Cummins, J. (1994). From coercive to collaborative relations of power in the teaching of literacy. In B.M. Ferdman, R.-M.Weber, & A.G.Ramierz (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures (pp. 295-331). Albany: State University of New York Press.
12. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
13. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
14. Freedman, L. (1993). Teacher talk: The role of the teacher in literature discussion groups. In K.M.Pierce & C.J.Gilles (Eds.), Cycles of meaning: Exploring the po- tential of talk in learning communities (pp. 219-235). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretations of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
16. Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Turner, M.G. (1997). Putting language back into language arts: When the radical middle meets the third space. Language Arts, 74, 368-378
17. Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-471.
18. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Lindfors, J.W. (1999). Children’s inquiry: Using language to make sense of the world. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Lotman, Y.M. (1988). Text within text. Soviet Psychology, 26, 32-51.
21. Manke, M. (1997). Classroom power relations: Understanding student-teacher interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Moll, L.C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Moll, L.C. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R.Beach, J.L.Green, M.L.Kamil, & T.Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 211-244). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
25. Nystrand. M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. O’Connor, M.C. & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318-335.
27. Oyler, C. (1996a). Making room for students in an urban first grade: Sharing teacher authority in room 104. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Oyler, C. (1996b). Sharing authority: Student initiations during teacher-led readalouds of information books. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 149-160.
29. Oyler, C., & Becker, J. (1997). Teaching beyond the progressive-traditional dichotomy: Sharing authority and sharing vulnerability. Curriculum Inquiry, 27, 453-467.
30. Pappas, C.C. (1999). Becoming literate in the borderlands. In A Goncu (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 228-260). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Pappas, C.C., & Barry, A. (1997). Scaffolding urban students’ initiations: Transactions in reading information books in the reading-aloud curriculum genre. In N. J.Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in the elementary classroom: Quest and discovery (pp. 215-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Ramirez, A. (1988). Analyzing speech acts. In J.L.Green & J.O.Harker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse (pp. 135-163). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Shuy, R. (1988). Identifying dimensions of classroom language. In J.L.Green & J. O.Harker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse (pp. 115-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Swadener, B.B., & Lubeck, S. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families “at promise�?: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35. Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20, 369-405.
36. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
37. Wells, G. (1994). The complimentary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning.�? Linguistics and Education, 6, 41-90.
38. Wells, G. (1998). Some questions about direct instruction: Why? To whom? How? And when? Language Arts, 76, 27-35.
39. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G.L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
40. Willinsky, J. (1990). The New Literacy: Redefining reading and writing in the schools. New York: Routledge.
41. Young, R. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.