Programmable imaging: Towards a flexible camera

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 7-22

  Nayar, Shree K ^a   Branzoi, Vlad ^a   Boult, Terry E ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b University of Colorado Colorado Springs   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive optics; Digital micro mirror device; Feature detection; Field of view; Flexible imaging; High dynamic range imaging; MEMS; Micro mirror array; Multi viewpoint imaging; Object recognition; Optical processing; Programmable imaging; Resolution; Stereo

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL MICRO-MIRROR DEVICE; FIELD OF VIEW; FLEXIBLE IMAGING; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGING; MICRO-MIRROR ARRAY; MULTI-VIEWPOINT IMAGING; OPTICAL PROCESSING; PROGRAMMABLE IMAGING; STEREO;

ADAPTIVE OPTICS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; MIRRORS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; RADIOMETRY;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 33744952132     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-005-3102-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Castracane, J. and Gutin, M. A. 1999. DMD-based bloom control for intensified imaging systems. In Diffractive and Holographic Tech., Syst., and Spatial Light Modulators VI, vol. 3633, pp. 234-242. SPIE.
2. Christensen, M.P., Euliss, G.W., McFadden, M.J., Coyle, K.M., Milojkovic, P., Haney, M.W., Gracht, J. van der, and Athale, R. A. October 2002. Active-eyes: An adaptive pixel-by-pixel image-segmentation sensor architecture for high-dynamic-range hyperspectral imaging. Applied Optics, 41(29):6093-6103.
3. Dudley, D., Duncan, W., and Slaughter, J. February 2003. Emerging digital micromirror device (DMD) applications. White paper, Texas Intruments.
4. Ginosar, R., Hilsenrath, O., and Zeevi, Y. September 1992. Wide dynamic range camera. U.S. Patent 5, 144,442.
5. Goodman, J. W. 1968. Introduction to Fourier Optics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Grossberg, M.D. and Nayar, S.K. 2005. The raxel imaging model and ray-based calibration. IJCV, 61(2):119-137.
7. Hicks, R. A. 2003. Personal Communication.
8. Hornbeck, L.J. 1988. Bistable deformable mirror device. In Spat. Light Mod. and Apps., vol. 8. OSA.
9. Hornbeck, L.J. August 1989. Deformable-mirror spatial light modulators. In Projection Displays III, vol. 1150, pp. 86-102. SPIE.
10. Hornbeck, L.J. 1995. Projection displays and MEMS: Timely convergence for a bright future. In Micromachined Devices and Components, vol. 2642. SPIE.
11. Kang, S.B., Uyttendaele, M., Winder, S., and Szeliski, R. 2003. High dynamic range video. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. of SIGGRAPH 2003), 22(3):319-325.
12. Kearney, K.J. and Ninkov, Z. 1998. Characterization of digital micromirror device for use as an optical mask in imaging and spectroscopy. Spatial Light Modulators, 3292:81-92. SPIE.
13. Malbet, F., Yu, J., and Shao, M. 1995. High dynamic range imaging using a deformable mirror for space coronography. Public. of the Astro. Soc. of the Pacific, 107:386.
14. Murase, H. and Nayar, S.K. 1995. Visual learning and recognition of 3d objects from appearance. IJCV, 14(1):5-24.
15. Nayar, S.K. and Branzoi, V. 2003. Adaptive Dynamic Range Imaging: Optical Control of Pixel Exposures over Space and Time. Proc. of Inter. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1168-1175.
16. Nayar, S.K. and Mitsunaga, T. 2000. High dynamic range imaging: Spatially varying pixel exposures. Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1:472479.
17. Nayar, S.K. and Narasimhan, S.G. 2002. Assorted pixels: Multi-sampled imaging with structural models. Proc. of Euro. Conf. on Comp. Vis. (ECCV), 4:636-152.
18. Smith, W.J. 1966. Modern Optical Engineering. McGraw-Hill.
19. Turk, M. and Pentland, A.P. 1991. Face recognition using eigenfaces. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 586-591.
20. Tyson, R.K. 1998. Principles of Adaptive Optics. Academic Press.