Minimum perceived VAS differences at an interval of 7 days

Pain Clinic

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 119-121

  Roytman, Timur M ^a   Kitagawa, Kevin M ^a   Yamamoto, Loren G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Pain; VAS; Visual analog scale

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IONTOPHORESIS; MALE; NOCICEPTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN PARAMETERS; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 33744942390     PISSN: 01691112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856906776760399     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. McCraig LF, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1998 Emergency Department Summary: Advance data from vital and health statistics, No. 313. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics 9 (2000).
2. Bird SB, Dickson EW, Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale, Ann Emerg Med 38, 639-43 (2001).
3. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk FP, et al., Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity, Ann Emerg Med 27, 485-9 (1996).
4. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE, Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale, Ann Emerg Med 38, 633-8 (2001).
5. Kelly AM, Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med 5, 1086-90 (1998).
6. Yamamoto LG, Nomura JT, Sato RL, et al., Minimum clinically significant VAS differences for simultaneous (paired) interval serial pain assessments, Am J Emerg Med 3, 176-9 (2003).
7. http://www.iomed.com/products/faq.htm#sen