Biologically motivated perceptual feature: Generalized robust invariant feature

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3852 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 305-314

  Kim, Sungho ^a   Kweon, In So ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETECTORS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT MODEL; EDGE ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL FEATURE;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 33744931891     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11612704_31     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Evaluation of interest point detectors. IJCV 37 (2000) 151-172
2. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: Scale &: affine invariant interest point detectors. IJCV 60 (2004) 63-86
3. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV 60 (2004) 91-110
4. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. PAMI 27 (2005) 1615-1630
5. Ke, Y., Sukthankar, R.: PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In: CVPR'04. (2004) 506-513
6. Tico, M., Kuosmanen, P.: Fingerprint matching using an orientation-based minutia descriptor. PAMI 25 (2003) 1009-1014
7. Belongie, S., Malik, J., Puzicha, J.: Shape matching and bject recognition using shape contexts. PAMI 24 (2002) 509-522
8. Serre, T., Wolf, L., Poggio, T.: Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex. In: CVPR'05. (2005)
9. Ringach, D.L.: Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive field in macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 88 (2001) 455-463
10. Gawne, T.J., Martin, J.M.: Responses of primate visual cortical V4 neurons to simultaneously presented stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 88 (2002) 1128-1135
11. Boynton, G.M.: Adaptation and attentional selection. Nature Neurosci. 7 (2004) 8-10
12. Chomat, O., de Verdière, V.C., Hall, D., Crowley, J.L.: Local scale selection for gaussian based description techniques. In: ECCV'00, London, UK, Springer-Verlag (2000) 117-133
13. Wurtz, R.H., Kandel, E.R.: Perception of motion, depth and form. Principles of Neural Science (2000) 548-571
14. Kouh, M., Riesenhuber, M.: Investigating shape representation in area V4 with hmax: Orientation and grating selectivitiesn. (Technical report)
15. Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-component: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147
16. Okada, K., Comaniciu, D.: Scale selection for anisotropic scale-space: Application to volumetric tumor characterization. In: CVPR'04. (2004) 594-601
17. Pasupathy, A., Connor, C.E.: Shape representation in area V4: Position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. J. Neurophysiol 86 (2001) 2505-2519
18. Reisfeld, D., Wolfson, H., Yeshurun, Y.: Context-free attentional operators: The generalized symmetry transform. IJCV 14 (1995) 119-130
19. Latecki, L.J., Lakämper, R.: Convexity rule for shape decomposition based on discrete contour evolution. CVIU 73 (1999) 441-454
20. Loy, G., Zelinsky, A.: Fast radial symmetry transform for detecting points of interest. PAMI 25 (2003) 959-973
21. Schiele, B., Crowley, J.L.: Recognition without correspondence using multidimensional receptive field histograms. IJCV 36 (2000) 31-50