Resource quality or harem size: What influences male tenure at refuge sites in tree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)?

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 175-183

  Kelly, Clint D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAREM; INSECT; MATE LOCATION; REFUGE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

ANIMALIA; ANOSTOSTOMATIDAE; HEMIDEINA; HEMIDEINA CRASSIDENS; INSECTA; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 33744929651     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0154-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alcock J (1994) Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:1-21
2. Bennington CC, Thayne WV (1994) Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology 75:717-722
3. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1977) Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats III. Mating systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:1-17
4. Brown WD, Crespi BJ, Choe JC (1997) Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 130-145
5. Darwin C (1874) The descent of man, and selection hi relation to sex. J. Murray, London
6. Davies NB (1991) Mating systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 263-294
7. Dodson GN (1997) Resource defense mating system hi antlered flies, Phytalmia spp (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:496-504
8. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223
9. Field LH (2001) Aggression behaviour in New Zealand tree wetas. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 333-349
10. Field LH, Sandlant GR (1983) Aggression and mating behavior in the Stenopelmatidae (Orthoptera, Ensifera), with reference to New Zealand wetas. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems-sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 120-146
11. Field LH, Deans NA (2001a) Sexual selection and secondary sexual characters of wetas and king crickets. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 179-204
12. Field LH, Jarman TH (2001b) Mating behaviour. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 317-332
13. Field LH, Sandlant GR (2001c) The gallery-related ecology of New Zealand tree wetas, Hemideina femorata and Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera, Anostostomatidae). In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 243-257
14. Fincke OM (1992) Consequences of larval ecology for territoriality and reproductive success of a neotropical damselfly. Ecology 73:449-462
15. Fincke OM, Hadrys H (2001) Unpredictable offspring survivorship in the damselfly, Megaloprepus coerulatus, shapes parental behavior, constrains sexual selection, and challenges traditional fitness estimates. Evolution 55:762-772
16. Fincke OM, Waage JK, Koenig WD (1997) Natural and sexual selection components of odonate mating patterns. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 58-74
17. Gibbs GW (2001) Habitats and biogeography of New Zealand's Deinacridine and tusked weta species. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 35-55
18. Greenfield MD (1997) Sexual selection in resource defense polygyny: lessons from territorial grasshoppers. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 75-88
19. Gwynne DT, Jamieson I (1998) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in a harem-polygynous insect, the alpine weta (Hemideina maori, Orthoptera Stenopelmatidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 10:393-402
20. Hudson GV (1892) Manual of New Zealand entomology. West, Newman, London
21. Hudson GV (1920) On some examples of New Zealand insects illustrating the Darwinian principle of sexual selection. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 52:431-438
22. Jamieson IG, Forbes MR, McKnight EB (2000) Mark-recapture study of mountain stone weta Hemideina maori (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) on rock tor 'islands'. NZ J Ecol 24:209-214
23. Kelly CD (2005) Allometry and sexual selection of male weaponry in Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens. Behav Ecol 16:145-152
24. Kelly CD (2006) The relationship between resource control, association with females and male weapon size in a male-dominance insect. Ethology DOI 10.1111/j.1439.0310.2006.01193.x
25. Kirkendall LR, Kent DS, Raffa KF (1997) Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living tunnels for the evolution of social behaviour. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 181-215
26. Mitchell PL (1980) Combat and territorial defense of Acanthocephala femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:404-408
27. Reid ML, Roitberg BD (1994) Benefits of prolonged male residence with mates and brood in pine engravers (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oikos 70:140-148
28. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ
29. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ
30. Spencer AM (1995) Sexual maturity in the male tree weta Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera: Stenopelamatidae). In: Zoology. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 84
31. Stamps JA (1994) Territorial behavior: testing the assumptions. Adv Study Behav 23:173-232
32. Stringer LAN, Cary PRL (2001) Postembryonic development and related changes. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 399-426
33. Switzer PV (1993) Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol Ecol 7:533-555
34. Switzer PV (1997) Factors affecting site fidelity in a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera. Anim Behav 53:865-877
35. Switzer PV (2002) Territory quality, habitat selection, and competition in the amberwing dragonfly, Perithemis tenera (Say) (Odonata: Libellulidae): Population patterns as a consequence of individual behavior. J Kans Entomol Soc 75:145-157
36. Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M (2000) Artificial weta roosts: A technique for ecological study and population monitoring of Tree Weta (Hemideina) and other invertebrates. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 24:201-208
37. Tsubaki Y, Ono T (1986) Competition for territorial sites and alternative mating tactics in the dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea Rambur (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 97:234-252
38. Wade MJ (1995) The ecology of sexual selection: Mean crowding of females and resource-defense polygyny. Evol Ecol 9:118-124
39. Wells KD (1977) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58:750-762
40. Wilkinson GS, Dodson GN (1997) Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 310-328
41. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ