Commentary on "Scalloped dental implants: A retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect™ implants in 6 patients"

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 54-58

  Wöhrle, Peter S ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744927935     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/j.6480.2005.00037.x     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillolac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
2. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the Pink Esthetic Score. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:639-644.
3. Wöhrle PS. Nobel Perfect esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):64-73.
4. Nowzari H, Chee W, Yi K, Pak M, Chung WH, Rich S. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect™ implants in 6 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8:1-10.
5. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Sanz M. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(Suppl): 150-154.
6. Heithersay GS. Combined endodontic-orthodontic treatment of transverse root fractures in the region of the alveolar crest. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36:404-415.
7. Salama H, Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993; 13:312-333.
8. Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:351-360.
9. Schnitman PA, Wöhrle PS, Rubenstein JE, DaSilva JD, et al. Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:495-503.
10. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:491-501.
11. Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E, Becker BE, Lucchini JP. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 2005; 76:391-397.
12. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:261-267.
13. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000; 71:1412-1423.
14. Hammerle CH, Bragger U, Burgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:111-119.
15. Cameron H, Pilliar RM, Macnab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7:301-311.
16. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brocksted-Rasmussen H, Bunger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthoped Res 1992; 10:285-299.
17. Pilliar RM. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of movement at a porous-coated implant-bone interface. In: Davies EJ, ed. The bone-biomaterial interface. Toronto: University Press, 1991:380-387.
18. Serein IP. Comparison of radiographic image characteristics of Branemark and IMZ implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2:151-156.