Effect of mulching techniques on plot scale runoff: FDTF modeling and sensitivity analysis

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 326, Issue 1-4, 2006, Pages 277-294

  Ruy, S ^a   Findeling, A ^b   Chadoeuf, J ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Dept Performance of Tropical Production and Processing Systems   (France)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; Crop residues; Modeling; Runoff; Sensitivity; Unit hydrograph

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROPS; HYDRAULIC MODELS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BOOTSTRAP; CROP RESIDUES; MODELING; UNIT HYDROGRAPH;

AGRICULTURE;

AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROPS; HYDRAULIC MODELS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CROP RESIDUE; MODELING; MULCHING; PRODUCTIVITY; RAINFALL; RUNOFF; TRANSPORT PROCESS; WATER BUDGET;

AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHMS; FARM CROPS; HYDRAULICS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33744921077     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abrahams A.D., Parson A.J., and Wainwright J. Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, walnut gulch, southern Arizona. Journal of Hydrology 156 (1994) 431-446
2. Arreola Tostado, J.M., 1996. Etude et modélisation de l'effet des paillis sur le bilan hydrique-le cas du semis direct sous paillis au mexique. Dea report, CIRAD.
3. Bristow K.L., Campbell G.S., Papendick R.I., and Elliot L.F. Simulation of heat and moisture transfer through a surface residue-soil system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36 (1986) 193-214
4. Bussière F., and Cellier P. Modification of the soil temperature and water content regimes by a crop residue mulch: experiment and modelling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 68 (1994) 1-28
5. Campbell Scientific, I., 1998. CR10X Measurement and Control System, User's Manual. Campbell Scientific Ed., 22 pp.
6. Duband D., Obled C., and Rodriguez J.Y. Unit hydrograph revisited: an alternate iterative approach to uh and effective precipitation identification. Journal of Hydrology 150 (1993) 115-149
7. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 57: An introduction to the Bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
8. Fiedler, F.R., 1997. Hydrodynamic simulation of spatially variable overland flow. Dissertation, Colorado State University.
9. Findeling, A., 2001. Etude et modélisation de certains effets du semis direct avec paillis de résidus sur les bilans hydrique, thermique et azoté d'une culture de maïs pluvial au mexique. PhD thesis, ENGREF.
10. Findeling, A., Haverkamp, R., 2000. Time Evolution of Surface Soil Hydraulic Properties, in 25th Congress of European Geophysical Society, Nice.
11. Findeling A., Chanzy A., and de Louvigny N. Modeling heat and water flows through a mulch allowing for radiative and long distance convective exchanges in the mulch. Water Resources Research 39 9 (2003) 1244
12. Findeling A., Ruy S., and Scopel E. Modeling the effects of a partial residue mulch on runoff using a physically based approach. Journal of Hydrology 275 1-2 (2003) 49-66
13. Gilley J.E., and Kottwitz E.R. Maximum surface storage provided by crop residue. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 120 2 (1994) 440-449 (en (English))
14. Gilley J.E., Kottwitz E.R., and Wieman G.A. Roughness coefficients for selected residue materials. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 117 4 (1991) 503-514 (en (English))
15. Gonzalez Sosa E., Braud I., Thony J.L., Vauclin M., Bessemoulin P., and Calvet J.C. Modelling heat and water exchanges of fallow land covered with plant-residue mulch. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 97 (1999) 151-169
16. Haan C.T. Statistical Methods in Hydrology (1977), Iowa State Univ. Press, USA
17. Manly B.F.J. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. second ed. (1997), Chapman & Hall, London
18. Mielke P.W., Berry J., and Berry K.J. Permutation methods. A distance function approach (2001), Springer, New York
19. Nalbantis I., Obled C., and Rodriquez J.Y. Unit hydrograph and effective precipitation identification. Journal of Hydrology 168 (1995) 127-157
20. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 (1970) 282-290
21. Philip J.R. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science 83 (1957) 345-357
22. Poesen J.W.A., and Lavee H. Effects of size and incorporation of synthetic mulch on runoff and sediment yield from interills in a laboratory study with simulated rainfall. Soil and Tillage Research 21 (1991) 209-223
23. Rabinovich S.G. Measurement errors and uncertainties. Theory and practice (2000), Springer, New York (USA)
24. Rao K.P.C., Steenhuis T.S., Cogle A.L., Srinivasan S.T., Yule D.F., and Smith G.D. Rainfall infiltration and runoff from an alfisol in semi-arid tropical India. 1. No-till systems. Soil and Tillage Research 48 (1998) 51-59
25. Rodriguez F., Cudennec C., and Andrieu H. Application of morphological approaches to determine unit hydrographs of urban catchments. Hydrological Processes 19 (2005) 1021-1035
26. Rutter A.J., Kershaw K.A., Robins P.C., and Morton A.J. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. I. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of corsican pines. Agricultural Meteorology 9 (1971) 367-384
27. Savabi M.R., and Stott D.E. Plant residue impact on rainfall interception. ASAE 37 4 (1994) 1093-1098
28. Scopel, E., Muller, B., Arreola Tostado, J.M., Chavez Guerra, E., Maraux, F., 1998. Quantifying and Modelling the Effects of a Light Crop Residue on the Water Balance: An Application to Rainfed Maize in Western Mexico, in World Congress of Soil Science-Montpellier, France, CD ROM, CIRAD.
29. Sempere Torres D., Rodriguez J., and Obled C. Using the dpft approach to improve flash flood forecasting models. Natural Hazards 5 (1992) 17-41
30. Sherman L.K. A stream flow from rainfall by the unit-graph method. Engineering News-Record 108 (1932) 501-505
31. Valentin C., and Bresson L.M. Morphology, genesis and classification of surface crusts in loamy and sandy soils. Geoderma 55 (1992) 225-245
32. Vauclin M. Modélisation du transport de solutés dans la zone non saturée du sol. Revue des sciences de l'eau 7 1 (1994) 81-102
33. Yu B., Rose C.W., Ciesiolka C.C.A., and Cakurs U. The relationship between runoff rate and lag time and the effects of surface treatments at the plot scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal 45 5 (2000) 709-726
34. Zachmann J.E., and Linden D.R. Earthworm effects on corn residue breakdown and infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53 (1989) 1846-1849
35. Zin I., and Obled C. Geomorphological conditions for a robust unit hydrograph. In: Society E.G. (Ed). EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly vol. 5 (2003), European Geophysical Society, Nice