Male mating speed promote hybridization in the Rana lessonae-Rana esculenta waterfrog system

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 123-130

  Lengagne, T ^a   Grolet, O ^a   Joly, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Male competition; Mate choice; Scramble competition; Waterfrog

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FROG; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATING BEHAVIOR;

ANURA; RANA ESCULENTA; RANA LESSONAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33744918549     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0148-y     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abt G, Reyer HU (1993) Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:221-228
2. Bergen K, Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU (1997) Hybrid female matings are directly related to the availability of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta males in experimental populations. Copeia 1997:275-283
3. Berger L (1977) Systematics and hybridization in the Rana esculenta complex. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum, New York, pp 367-388
4. Berger L, Uzzell T, Hotz H (1988) Sex determination and sex ratios in western Palearctic water frogs: XX and XY female hybrids in the Pannonian basin? Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 140:220-239
5. Blankenhorn HJ (1977) Reproduction and mating behavior in Rana lessonae-Rana esculenta mixed populations. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum, New York, pp 389-409
6. Bourne GR (1993) Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra. Anim Behav 45:1051-1059
7. Colon L (2004) L'hybridogénèse dans le complexe Rana klepton esculenta. Apports des marqueurs génétiques. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lyon 1, France
8. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381
9. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269:56-58
10. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683-685
11. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1979) Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo. Anim Behav 27:1253-1267
12. Emlen ST (1968) Technique for marking anuran amphibians for behavioral studies. Herpetologica 24:172-173
13. Engeler B, Reyer HU (2001) Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta). Behav Ecol 12:600-606
14. Gerhardt HC, Dyson M, Tanner SD, Murphy CG (1994) Female treefrogs do not avoid heterospecific calls as they approach conspecific calls: implications for mechanisms of mate choice. Anim Behav 47:1323-1332
15. Graf J-D, Polls Pelaz M (1989) Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In: Dawley RM, Bogart JP (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum Bulletin, Albany, pp 298-302
16. Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193-197
17. Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am Nat 149:1-28
18. Halliday T (1983) Do frogs and toads choose their mates? Nature 306:226-227
19. Hotz H, Beerli P, Spolsky C (1992) Mitochondrial DNA reveals formation of nonhybrid frogs by natural matings between hemiclonal hybrids. Mol Biol Evol 9:610-620
20. Hubbs CL (1955) Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst Zool 4:1-20
21. Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC (1996) Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50:1382-1391
22. Joly P (1991) Variation in size and fecundity between neighbouring populations in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Alytes 9:79-88
23. Joly P (2001) The future of the selfish hemiclone: a neodarwinian approach to waterfrog evolution. Mitt Mus Nat Kd Berl 77:31-38
24. Licht LE (1976) Sexual selection in toads (Bufo americanus). Can J Zool 54:1277-1284
25. Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn MJ (1971) Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species of Hyla. Copeia 1971:154-156
26. Loman J, Madsen T (1986) Reproductive tactics of large and small male toads Bufo bufo. Oikos 46:57-61
27. McCarthy MA, Parris KM (2004) Clarifying the effect of toe clipping on frogs with Bayesian statistics. J Appl Ecol 41:780-786
28. McCullagh M, Nelder PJA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London
29. McDonald DB, Clay RP, Brumfield RT, Braun MJ (2001) Sexual selection on plumage and behavior in an avian hybrid zone: experimental tests of male-male interactions. Evolution 55:1443-1451
30. Murphy CG (1994) Chorus tenure of male barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa. Anim Behav 48:763-777
31. Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon Tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216:753-755
32. Noor MAF (1995) Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675
33. Noor MAF (1997) How often does sympatry affect sexual isolation in Drosophila? Am Nat 149:1156-1163
34. Pasteur N, Pasteur G, Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J (1987) Manuel technique de génétique par élé ctrophorèse de protéines. Lavoisier, Paris
35. Pfennig KS, Simovitch MA (2002) Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution 56:1840-1848
36. Randler C (2002) Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Anim Behav 63:103-119
37. Robertson JGM (1986) Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav 34:773-784
38. Robertson JGM (1990) Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog Uperoleia laevigata. Anim Behav 39:639-645
39. Roesli M, Reyer HU (2000) Male vocalization and female choice in the hybridogenetic Rana lessonae/Rana esculenta complex. Anim Behav 60:745-755
40. Rosenfield JA, Kodric-Brown A (2003) Sexual selection promotes hybridization between Pecos pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis and sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus. J Evol Biol 16:595-606
41. Saetre GP, Kral M, Bures S (1997) Differential species recognition abilities of males and females in a flycatcher hybrid zone. J Avian Biol 28:259-263
42. Schmeller DS (2004) Tying ecology and genetics of hemiclonally reproducing waterfrogs (Rana, Anura). Ann Zool Fenn 41:681-687
43. Schmeller DS, O'Hara R, Kokko H (2005) Male adaptive stupidity: male mating pattern in hybridogenetic frogs. Evol Ecol Res 7:1039-1050
44. Schultz RJ (1969) Unisexuallity and polyploidy in the teleost Poeciliopsis (Poecilidae) and other vertebrates. Am Nat 103:605-619
45. Tunner HG (1973) Das albumin und andere bluteiweisse bei Rana ridibunda Pallas, Rana lessonae Camerano, Rana esculenta Linné und deren hybriden. Z Zoolog Syst Evol Forsch 11:219-233
46. Tunner HG (1974) Die klonale struktur einer wasserfroschpopulation. Z Zoolog Syst Evol Forsch 12:309-314
47. Uzzell T, Berger L (1975) Electrophoretic phenotypes of Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae and their hybridogenetic associate, Rana esculenta. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 127:13-24
48. Vorburger C (2001) Non-hybrid offspring from matings between hemiclonal hybrid waterfrogs suggest occasional recombination between clonal genomes. Ecol Lett 4:628-636
49. Waage JK (1979) Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33:104-116
50. Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666-693
51. Wirtz P (1999) Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58:1-12