Emergence of multi-stakeholder-driven cooperative research in the Northwest Atlantic: The case of the Northeast Consortium

Marine Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 580-592

  Hartley, Troy W ^a   Robertson, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative research; Northeast Consortium; Northeast fisheries management; Politics; Socioeconomic impacts

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY POLICY; RESEARCH; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MAINE;

EID: 33744915822     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2005.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. National Fisheries Conservation Center. Investigating cooperative data gathering, Technical report (1999), National Fisheries Conservation Center, Ojai, CA. nfcc-fisheries.org/media/ps_icdg.pdf
2. Dobbs D. The great gulf: fishermen, scientists and the struggle to revive the world's greatest fishery (2000), Washington, DC, Island Press
3. Harms J, Silvia G. The economics of cooperative fishery research: a survey of US West Coast groundfish industry and scientists. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET) 2000 conference, July 10-14, 2000, Corvallis, OR. oregonstate.edu/dept/IIFET/2000/papers/harms.pdf.
4. Sissenwine M. Fisheries cooperative research, testimony of Dr. Michael Sissenwine, Director of Northeast Fishery Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce, before the Committee on Resources, Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans, US House of Representatives, Ocean City, MD, 2001. www.nefsc.noaa.gov/Sissenwine-Final-Testimony.pdf
5. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment. Fishing grounds: defining a new era for American fisheries management. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000.
6. NOAA. Stock assessment program, web site, www.st.nmfs.gov/StockAssessment/StockAssessment.html. Washington, DC: NOAA; 2005.
7. Wallace RW, Fletcher KM. Understanding fisheries management: a manual for understanding the federal fisheries management process, including analysis of the 1996 sustainable fisheries act. 2nd ed. MASGC-H-00-001, Mobile, AL: Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium; 2000.
8. National Research Council. Review of northeast fishery stock assessments (1998), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
9. NMFS Northeast Fisheries Science Center. www.nefsc.noaa.gov/sos/spsyn/pg/cod/#gmabun; 2005.
10. Magnuson Stevens Act, Magnuson fisheries conservation and management act of 1976, Public Law 94-265, Amended by the sustainable fisheries act of 1996, Public law. p. 104-297.
11. Federal Fisheries Investment Task Force. Federal fisheries investment task force report to congress, http://www.nmfs.gov/sfa/ITF.html. Washington, DC: NOAA; 1999.
12. Brazer, E.O. Does the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) have a future. In: The Gulf of Maine? thesis. http://envstudies.brown.edu/thesis/2003/eric_brazer/, Providence, RI: Brown University Center for Environmental Studies; 2003.
13. New England Fisheries Management Council. Appendix A: history of past management actions and impacts. Framework adjustment 41 to the northeast multispecies fishery management plan, http://www.nefmc.org/nemulti/index.html. Newburyport, MA: New England Fisheries Management Council; 2005.
14. Conservation Law Foundation. Rebuilding groundfish: timeline for CLF's advocacy; 2005. http://www.clf.org/programs/cases.asp?id=344.
15. Hall-Arber M., Dyer C., Poggie J., McNally J., and Gagne R. New England's fishing communities, MIT-T-01-001 (2001), MIT Sea Grant, Cambridge, MA
16. Coletti E.A. In New England, no more young men and the sea. Christian Science Monitor 91 97 (1999) 1
17. Smith S., Jacob S., Jepson M., and Israel G. After the Florida Net Ban: the impacts on commercial fishing families. Society and Natural Resources 16 1 (2003) 39-59
18. Butler M.J., Steele L.L., and Robertson R.A. Adaptive resource management in the New England groundfish fishery: implications for public participation and impact assessment. Society and Natural Resources 14 9 (2001) 791-801
19. Cook J. quoted in Kurklan J. Protected Species Considerations. In: Witherell D, editor. Managing our nation's fisheries: past, present and future. Proceedings of a conference on fisheries management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003. Washington, DC: NOAA; 2004. p. 177.
20. Kurland J. Protecting fish habitat. In: Witherell D. (Ed). Managing our nation's fisheries: past, present and future. Proceedings of a conference on fisheries management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003 (2004), NOAA, Washington, DC 172-173
21. Wilson B. Protected species considerations. In: Witherell D. (Ed). Managing our nation's fisheries: past, present and future. Proceedings of a conference on fisheries management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003 (20045), NOAA, Washington, DC 183
22. Witherell D. Future directions in fisheries policy. In: Witherell D. (Ed). Managing our nation's fisheries: past, present and future. Proceedings of a conference on fisheries management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003 (2004), NOAA, Washington, DC 210
23. Barclay C. Vessel monitoring system and litigation data base net NOAA fisheries prestigious national award," Press release (2003), NOAA Fisheries, Washington, DC
24. Faris T., and Keys D. NOAA fisheries national environmental policy act (NEPA) training program. In: Witherell D. (Ed). Managing our nation's fisheries: past, present and future. Proceedings of a conference on fisheries management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003 (2004), NOAA, Washington, DC 251-252
25. Spring M., quoted in Witherell D. Future Directions in Fisheries Policy. In: Witherell D, editor. Managing Our Nation's Fisheries: Past, Present and Future; Proceedings of a conference on fisheireis management in the United States held in Washington, DC, November 2003. Washington, DC: NOAA; 2004. p. 211.
26. Olson J., and Clay P. The (Round II) disaster assistance social and economic survey: a review and orientation (2001), Northeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Tech Memo, Woods Hole, MA. www.nefsc.noaa.gov/read/socialsci/survey-initiative/pdfs/survey_discussion.pdf
27. Northeast Consortium. www.northeastconsortium.org; 2005.
28. Bucklin A. Director and principal investigator of the Northeast Consortium (2002), University of New Hampshire, Interview, Durham, NH
29. Goss H. Research using two heads better than one in the Gulf of Maine. Coastal Services 7 5 (2004) 2-3
30. Anonymous Conservation Enginee. Personal communication; 2003.
31. Anonymous Oceanographer. Personal communication; 2003.
32. Robertson R.A., and Hartley T.W. Cooperative research and the management of marine fishery resources in New England: a comprehensive assessment", report (2004), Northeast Consortium, Durham, NH
33. Northeast Consortium. Final technical evaluation for northeast consortium cooperative research projects, www.northeastconsortium.org/participantscomplete.shtml, Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire; 2004.
34. Bergeron D., Fishing industry experts release study to aid gloucester harbor planning process: shoreline infrastructure key to the future of commercial fisheries in gloucester," press release. Gloucester, MA: Massachusetts Fishermen's Partnership; 2005 www.mass-fish.org/press%20releases%20current/gloucester_study.htm
35. Susskind L., and Cruikshank J. Breaking the impasse: consensual approaches to resolving public disputes (1987), Basic Books, New York, NY
36. Williams B.A., and Matheny A.R. Democracy, dialogue, and environmental disputes: the contested languages of social regulations (1995), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
37. Forester J. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes (1999), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Innes J.E. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 1 (1998) 52-63
39. Mansbridge J.J. Beyond adversarial democracy (1983), Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL
40. Wondolleck J.M., and Yaffee S.L. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management (2000), Island Press, Washington, DC
41. Leach W.D., and Sabatier P.A. Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. In: Sabatier P.A., et al. (Ed). Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (Chapter 8)
42. National Research Council. Cooperative research in the National Marine Fisheries Service (2004), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
43. US Commission on Ocean Policy. An ocean blueprint for the 21st century: final report of the US commission on ocean policy (2004), US Commission on Ocean Policy, Washington, DC. www.oceancommission.gov/documents/prepub_report/pre_pub_fin_report.pdf
44. Pew Oceans Commission. America's living ocean: charting a course for sea change, summary report recommendations for a new ocean policy (2003), Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, VA. www.pewoceans.org/oceans/downloads/oceans_report.pdf
45. NMFS Cooperative Research Partnership Program. web-site, http://coopresearch.nero.noaa.gov/. Gloucester, MA: NOAA Fisheries; 2004.