Integrating digital image management software for improved patient care and optimal practice management

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 834-840

  Starr, Jon C ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

DERMATOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33744913277     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32169.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Strauss RM Goodfield MJ. Digital imaging in clinical dermatology across the UK in the year 2001. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2003 17 : 285 7.
2. Siegel DM. Resolution in digital imaging: enough already? Semin Cutan Med Surg 2002 21 : 209 15.
3. Ratner D. Real photographic prints from digital images. Dermatol Surg 2000 26 : 799 800.
4. Ratner D Thomas CO Bickers D. The uses of digital photography in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999 41 : 5 Part 1 : 749 56.
5. Voigt H Classen R. Computer vision and digital imaging technology in melanoma detection. Semin Oncol 2002 29 : 308 27.
6. Abramovits W Stevenson LC. Changing paradigms in dermatology: new ways to examine the skin using noninvasive imaging methods. Clin Dermatol 2003 21 : 353 8.
7. Halpern AC Marghoob AA Bialoglow TW, et al. Standardized positioning of patients (poses) for whole body cutaneous photography. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 49 : 593 8.
8. Scheinfeld N Fisher M Genis P Long H. Evaluating patient acceptance of a teledermatology link of an urban urgent-care dermatology clinic run by residents with board certified dermatologists. Skinmed 2003 2 : 159 62.
9. Scheinfeld N Kurz J Teplitz E. A comparison of the concordance of digital images, live examinations, and skin biopsies for the diagnosis of hospitalized dermatology consultation patients. Skinmed 2003 2 : 14 9.
10. Krupinski EA LeSueur B Ellsworth L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J 1999 5 : 257 63.
11. Kvedar JC Edwards RA Menn ER, et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol 1997 133 : 161 7.
12. Lyon CC Harrison PV. A portable digital imaging system in dermatology: diagnostic and educational applications. J Telemed Telecare 1997 Suppl 1 : 81 3.
13. Fawcett RS Widmaier EJ Cavanaugh SH. Digital technology enhances dermatology teaching in a family medicine residency. Fam Med 2004 36 : 89 91.
14. Schiener R Pillekamp H Weber L Hartmann K Peter RU. A teledermatological approach to enhance diagnostic accuracy in dermatohistopathology. J Telemed Telecare 2003 9 : 135 9.
15. Berg D. A simple tool for teaching flap design with digital images. Dermatol Surg 2001 27 : 1043 5.
16. Niamtu J. Image is everything: pearls and pitfalls of digital photography and PowerPoint presentations for the cosmetic surgeon. Dermatol Surg 2004 30 : 81 91.
17. Scheinfeld NS Flanigan K Moshiyakhov M Weinberg JM. Trends in the use of cameras and computer technology among dermatologists in New York City 2001-2002. Dermatol Surg 2003 29 : 822 5 discussion 826.
18. Stone JL Peterson RL Wolf JE Jr.. Digital imaging techniques in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990 23 : 5 Part 1 : 913 7.
19. HIPAA Security Standards A guide for dermatology practices. P.C : Epstein Becker & Green, 2004.
20. Figgener L Runte C. Digital radiography and electronic data storage from the perspective of legal requirements for record keeping. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2003 21 : 40 4.
21. Scheinfeld N. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law. Arch Dermatol 2004 140 : 473 6.