A Turkish perspective on communication disorders

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 76-88

  Topbas, Seyhun ^a  

^a ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Profession; Speech and language disorders; Speech and language therapy services; Turkey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPEAN UNION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST; SPEECH THERAPY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UNITED STATES;

COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; CULTURE; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY; TURKEY;

EID: 33744912784     PISSN: 14015439     EISSN: 16512022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14015430500342384     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Lian, CHT and Shireen, A. (2001) The education and practice of speech-language pathologists in Malaysia AJSLP., 10(1), pp. 3-7.
2. SChengappa. Speech and language pathology in a multilingual context: Indian experience. In:MSThirumalai, editor. Language in India. 2001;(3):1-8.
3. P Andanda, H Bonaretti, K, Wemmer. Public regulation of audiology and speech language pathology: A critique. Wits Law School. Discipline of Audiology, School of Human and Community Development Pub. University of the Witwatersrand Press; 2003.
4. Yiu, E.ML and Stokes, FS. (2000) East meets west: The study of communication disorders in Chinese Int J Lang Commun Disord., 35(4), pp. 449-50.
5. So, LKH and Dodd, B. (1994) Phonologically disordered Cantonese-speaking children Clin Ling Phonet., 8(3), pp. 235-55.
6. Hua, Z.(2002) Phonological development in specific contexts: Studies of Chinese-speaking children. Toronto: Multilingual Press.
7. Cheung, P and Evelyn, A. (2000) Patterns of phonological disability in Cantonese-speaking children in Hong-Kong Int J Lang Commun Disord., 35, pp. 451-73.
8. Stokes, SF and Fletcher, P. (2000) Lexical diversity and productivity in Cantonese speaking children with specific language impairment Intl J Lang Commun Disord., 35, pp. 527-41.
9. Müller, N. (2003) Multilingual communication disorders: Exampla et desidereta J Multilingual Commun Disord, 1, pp. 1-12.
10. AJSchaufeli. Turkish in an immigrant setting. A comparative study of the first language of monolingual and bilingual Turkish children. Universiteit van Amsterdam: Academisch Poefschrift; 1991.
11. KYagmur. Sociolinguistic aspects of first language attrition among Turkish migrants in Sydney. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. AnkaraTurkey: Ankara University; 1997. p. 231-41.
12. Grimes, BF.(1992) Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas. Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
13. Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at http://www.disisleri.gov.tr Accessed on October 24, 2003.
14. DInanoglu. IREM: Izmit Rehabilitasyon Merkezi. [Izmit Rehabilitaion Center]. Reports of Project Hope: Turkish Coordination. Washington: Project Hope Report; 2002.
15. Kritikos, EP. (2003) Speech-language pathologists' beliefs about language assessment of bilingual/bicultural individuals AJSLP., 12(1), pp. 73-91.
16. Lindsay, G and Soloff, N and Law, J and Band, S and Peacey, N and Gascoigne, M and (2002) Speech and language therapy services to education in England and Wales Int J Lang Commun Disord., 37(3), pp. 273-88.
17. Comrie, B.(1992) Turkic Languages. In International encyclopedia of linguistics. Vol 4. (pp. 187-90). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Kornfilt, J.(1997) Descriptive grammars: Turkish. London: Routledge.
19. Erguvanli-Taylan, E.(1984) The function of word order in Turkish grammar. University of California publications in Linguistics. Vol 106. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
20. Konrot, A. (1981) A new phoneme or voiced velar stop erosion? Phonetic explanation for the phonological status of the so-called soft-g in Turkish Essex University: Occasional Papers., 24, pp. 12-24.
21. Yavas, M.(1998) Phonology: Development and disorders. San Diego: Singular Publishing.
22. Topbas S, Yavas M. Turkish phonological acquisition and disorders. In: Hua Z, Dodd B, editors. Phonological Development and Disorders: A cross-linguistic perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Pub; (in press) - (for 2006).
23. UNICEF. At a glance: Turkey. Available at http://www.unicef.at.statistics.html. Accessed on October 23, 2003.
24. Turkish Ministry of Education Report. Archives of research in communication disorders. Turkish Ministry of EducationAnkara: Milli Egitim Bakanligi Publication; 1996.
25. AShilovskaya, KBleile. Russian perspectives on articulation and phonological disorders. San FranciscoCA: American Speech-Lang-Hearing Association; 1999.
26. Kircaali-Iftar, G.(2000) Special Education in Turkey. In Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of the handicapped and other exceptional children and adults. Vol 3. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Turkish National Report for the Handicapped. Özürlüler için ülke raporu. [National Report for The Handicapped 1995-2000]. AnkaraTurkey: TC Basbakanlik Özürlüler Idaresi Baskanligi; 2001.
28. STopbas, SÖzdemir. An emerging profession in Turkey: Speech and language therapy. Abstract Proceedings of International Special Education Congress, 2001 Jul 24-27; AntalyaTurkey.
29. FAktas. Türkiye'de odyoloji. [Audiology in Turkey]. Paper presented 2. Cochlear Implantation and Neuro-Otology Symposium; December 5-6, 2003; IstanbulTurkey.
30. Van der Gaag, F.(1996) Communicating quality: Professional standards for speech and language therapists 2nd edn. London: The Royal College of Speech and Language Threapists.
31. ASHA. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. American Speech-Lang-Hearing Association Statement LC 6-89; 1990, 1-2. Ad Hoc Committee. USA: ASHA Publications.
32. ASHA. The ASHA code of ethics. American Speech-Lang-Hearing Association StatementLC 36(Suppl 13); 1-2. Ad Hoc Committee. USA: ASHA Publications; 25, 1994.
33. Altay, B and Konrot, A and Pyman, B.(1989) Extra cochlear application of Nucleus 22 channel intra cochlear implant: A case report. In Cochlear implant: Acquisitions and controversies. (pp. 263-72). Toulouse: CochlearAG.
34. Konrot, A. (1994) Özel egitim alanina ögretmen yetistirmede bir uygulama. [A model in training special education teachers in Turkey] zel Egitim Dergisi, 1(1), pp. 47-53.
35. STopbas, AKonrot, MBasal. A survey regarding the competencies of speech and language pathologists: Perceptions about their current and future competencies. Abstracts of the Annual Congress of CEC-Council for Exceptional Children, 1996, CEC PublicationsOrlandoFlorida.
36. Conti-Ramsden, G and Botting, N. (1999) Characteristics of children attending language units in England: A national study of 7-year-olds Int J Lang Commun Disord., 34(4), pp. 359-66.
37. Enderby, P and Petheram, B. (2000) An analysis of referrals to speech and language therapy in 11 centers, 1987-95 Int J Lang Commun Disord, 35(1), pp. 137-46.
38. IALP News. Guidelines for initial education in Logopedics. (Speech/ LanguagePathology/Therapy, Orthophony). The Education Committee (Int Assoc Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 140894 RL disk 4); Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50:230-4.
39. RCSLT. Professional Standards. Available at http://www.rcslt.org/ profstand.shtml. Accessed on May 5,2005.
40. Konrot, A.(1995) Eskisehir ili okulöncesi ve ilk̈gretim çagi dil ve konusma sorunlu çocuklarin belirlenmesi. [A survey on the preschool and primary school aged speech and language disordered children]. Unpublished manuscript. Anadolu University at Eskisehir, Turkey.
41. Belgin, E and Kudal, I and Senol, S and Derinsu, U and Atabay, Ö and Ölçek, G and (1988) Ilkokul çagi ̧ocuklarinda konusma ve ses bozuklugu insidansi. [Incidence of speech and voice disorders in primary school children]. Unpublished paper. Turkey: Hacettepe University.
42. Özdemir, G. (2000) Beyin krizi nedir? [What is stroke?] Türk Beyin Damar Hastaliklari Dergisi., 3, pp. 1-4.
43. Topbas, S and Mavis, I and Erbas, D. (2003) Intentional communicative behaviours of Turkish speaking children with normal and delayed language development Child Care Health Dev., 29(5), pp. 345-55.
44. Aksu-Koç, AA and Slobin, DI.(1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. The Data. Vol 1. New Jersey: Hillsdale.
45. Ege, P and Acarlar, F and Güleryüz, F. (1998) Türkçe kazaniminda yas ve ortalama sözce uzunlugunun iliskisi. [Mean length of utterance and age relation in the acquisition of Turkish] Türk Psikol Derg [Turkish J Psychology], 13(1), pp. 19-34.
46. Topbas, S. (1997) Turkish children's phonological acquisition: implications for phonological disorders Eur J Disord Commun., 32(4), pp. 377-97.
47. Topbas, S and Mavis, I and Basal, M.(1997) Acquisition of bound morphemes: Nominal case morphology in Turkish. In Proceedings of the VIII International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. (pp. 127-37). Ankara: Ankara University Pub.
48. Topbas, S and Mavis, I and Özdemir, S.(2003) Mothers' intentional communicative language to Turkish children with delayed and normal language development. In Studies in Turkish linguistics. (pp. 469-79). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.
49. Küntay, AC. (2002) Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish Psychol Lang Commun., 6(1), pp.5-14.
50. Özsoy, Y.(1982) Eskisehir Konusma Degerlendirme Test Takimi. [Eskisehir assessment of speech test]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University Press Publications.
51. Topbas. Türkçe Sesletim Sesbilgisi Testi. [Turkish Articulation and Phonology Test]. AnkaraTurkey: Ministry of Turkish Education Pub; 4. Aksam Sanat Okulu; 2004.
52. Turon S. Konrot, A. Erdiņ, Gözdemir. Parkinson dizartrisinin tanisinda objektif bir yöntem: Elektroglottograf. [Electroglottographic study on the assessment of dysartria in Parkinson]. Proceedings of 4th National Neurology Conference, 1991, Association of Neurology PublicationsTurkey.
53. Konrot, A. (1986a) The listener's sensitivity to speaker's nonfluencies as a contributing factor at the point of origin of the problem of stuttering. Anadolu Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Anadolu University J Ed Faculty], 1(1), pp. 113-18.
54. Konrot, A. (1986b) Isitme engellilerde konusmanin bürünsel özellikleri nasil gelistirilir. [Developing suprasegmentals in the hearing impaired children] Anadolu Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Anadolu University J Ed Faculty], 1(1), pp. 119-29.
55. Mavis, I. (2000) Is agrammatism universal? A longitudinal case study with two Turkish Broca aphasics J Neurolinguistics., 13(4), pp. 310-12.
56. Mavis, I and Topbas, S.(2001) A linguistic analysis of spontaneous speech deviations of Turkish speakers with aphasia. In Abstracts of British Aphasiology Society Biennial Conference. England: The University of Exeter.
57. Topbas, S.(1996) Phonological analysis of speech disordered children: A suprasegmental study. Abstracts of 7th International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.
58. Topbas, S.(1999) Konusma sorunlu çocuklarin sesbilgisel çözümleme yöntemi ile degerlendirilmesi. [Phonologcal analysis of speech disordered children]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University Press.
59. Topbas, S and Konrot, A.(1998) Variability in phonological disorders: Can we search for systematicity? Evidence from Turkish-speaking children. In Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. (pp. 79-87). London: Whurr Publishers.
60. Topbas S. Does the speech of Turkish speaking phonologically disordered children differ from that of children speaking other languages? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. (in press scheduled for first special issue early 2006)
61. Kopkalli-Yavuz, H and Topbas, S.(1998) Phonological processes of Turkish phonologically disordered children. In Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. (pp. 88-97). London: Whurr Pub.
62. Yavas, M and Goldstein, B. (1998) Phonological assessment and treatment of bilingual speakers AJSLP., 7(2), pp. 49-61.
63. Yavas, M and Topbas, S. (2004) Liquid development in Turkish: Saliency versus frequency J Multilingual Commun Disord., 2(2), pp. 110-23.
64. Acarlar, F and Ege, P. (1996) Türkçe kazanimda kullanilan fonolojik süreçlerin incelenmesi. [Phonological processes in the acquisition of Turkish] Türk Psikol Derg [Turkish J Psychology], 11(38), pp. 35-43.
65. Slobin, DI.(1997) The universal, the typological and the particular in acquisition. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Expanding the contexts. Vol 5. (pp. 1-39). New Jersey: Hillsdale.
66. Özcan, HF.(1996) Is two-stage model of grammatical development universal? A study on morphological agreement in the development of L1 Turkish. Abstracts of 7th International Congress for the Study of Child Language. Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.
67. Aksu-Koç, AA.(1994) Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In Relating events in narrative a crosslinguistic developmental study. New Jersey: Hillsdale.
68. Özcan, FH.(1997) Comprehension of relative clauses in the acquisition of Turkish. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. (pp. 149-55). Ankara: Ankara University Press.
69. Özcan, HF.(2000) Production of relative clauses in the acquisition of Turkish: The role of parallel function hypothesis. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages. (pp. 307-15).Munich: Wiesbaden.
70. Topbas, S and Kopkalli-Yavuz, H.(1997) The onset of linguistic system: Is there evidence from the acquisition of final devoicing in Turkish?. In Proceedings of GALA '97 - Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
71. Slobin, DI. (1991) Aphasia in Turkish: Speech production in Broca's and Wernicke's patients Brain Lang., 41, pp. 149-64.
72. König, G and Büyükkantarcioglu, N and Karahan, F.(2002) Türk toplumunda okur-yazarlik ve dil farkindaligi: Ilkokul mezunu kadinlarin dil becerilerinin toplumbilim açisindan incelenmesi. [A sociocultural perspective on the analysis of awareness on the language skills of primary school graduate women]. In Proceedings of the XVIth Linguistics Conference. (pp. 196-216).Ankara: Hacettepe Pub.
73. Fenson, L and Dale, P and Reznick, JS and Thal, D and Bates, E and Hartung, JP and (1996) MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories 3rd ed. San Diego: Singular Pub.
74. WPHresko, DKReid, DDHammill. Test of Early Language Development - TELD3. 3rd ed. AustinTX: Pro-ed Pub; 1999.
75. Semel, E and Wiig, EH and Secord, W.(1994) Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals - CELF 3. San Antonio: The Psychological Corprporation Pub.
76. ASHA. (1985) Clinical management of communicatively handicapped minority populations ASHA., 27, pp.29- 32.
77. AHolmen, JNJorgensen, editors. Der et conversation 801 degil mi? Perspectives on the bilingualism of Turkish speaking children and adolescents in North Western Europe. Copenhagen: The Koege Project; 2000.
78. Ergenç, I. (1993) Yurtdisindaki Türk çocuklarinin anadili sorunu. [Native language problems of Turkish children living abroad as minorities]. Dilbilim Arastirmalari [Linguistics Research], 4, pp. 61-9.
79. FAkkök. Reflections from the Turkish parents of children with disabilities. International Special Education Congress 2000: Including the Excluded. Abstracts of ISEC; 2000Jul1-6. ManchesterUK: University of Manchester; 2000.
80. ACavkaytar, SBatu, OBeklan, BKartal, F, Güllüpinar. Gelisimsel geriligi olan çocuga sahip ailelerin aile özellikleri. [Family characteristics of developmentally delayed special needs children]. Paper presented at the13th National Special Education Congress; 2003Nov12-14, Anadolu University pressEskisehirTurkey.
81. IMavis. Public awareness on recognizing neurological disorders and Aphasia. Abstracts of the International Conference on Special Education; 2001Jun1-3, AntalyaTurkey.
82. Duman, S.(1999) Schweigen: Zum kommunikativen handeln Türkischer Frauen in Familie und Gruppe. New York: Waxmann-Münster.
83. Açikalin, I.(2002) Kadin ve erkek hastalarin vizit sirasinda sergiledikleri dilsel farkliliklar. [The linguistic gender difference in hospitalized female and male patients during doctor visits]. In Proceedings of the XVIth Linguistics Conference. (pp. 179-83). Ankara: Hacettepe University Press Pub.
84. Tunçel, R. (2000) Misinterpretations in translation resulting from socio-cultural diversities Anadolu Universitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Anadolu University J Ed Faculty], 10(2), pp. 185-92.