What's wrong with business ethics

International Social Science Journal

Volumn , Issue 185, 2005, Pages 561-571

  Rodin, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CORPORATE STRATEGY; ETHICS; FRIEDMANN THEORY; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 33744823786     PISSN: 00208701     EISSN: 14682451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.00571.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. EVAN, W. M., AND FREEMAN, E. 1996. "A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism", In: Chryssides, G. D., and Kaler, J. H., eds, An Introduction to Business Ethics. London: Thomson Business Press, pp. 254-266.
2. FREEMAN, E. 1984. Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Press.
3. FRENCH, P. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. FRIEDMAN, M. 1993. "The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits", In: Chryssides, G. D., and Kaler, J. H., eds, An Introduction to Business Ethics. London: Thomson Business Press, pp. 249-254.
5. nd edition. [The Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St Martin's Press, 1965.].
6. PORTER, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
7. nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.