Proteins of the same fold and unrelated sequences have similar amino acid composition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 275-279

  Ofran, Yanay ^a   Margalit, Hanah ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 33744815655     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20964     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Krigbaum WR, Knutton SP. Prediction of the amount of secondary structure in a globular protein from its amino acid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70(10):2809-2813.
2. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 1974;13(2):211-222.
3. Eisenhaber F, Frommel C, Argos P. Prediction of secondary structural content of proteins from their amino acid composition alone. II. The paradox with secondary structural class. Proteins 1996;25(2):169-179.
4. Koehl P, Levitt M. Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96(22):12524-12529.
5. Cai Y, Zhou G. Prediction of protein structural classes by neural network. Biochimie 2000;82(8):783-785.
6. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Holbrook SR, Kim SH. Prediction of protein folding class using global description of amino acid sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92(19):8700-8704.
7. Lin Z, Pan XM. Accurate prediction of protein secondary structural content. J Protein Chem 2001;20(3):217-220.
8. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Jernigan RL, Erman B. Understanding the recognition of protein structural classes by amino acid composition. Proteins 1997;29(2):172-185.
9. Dubchak I, Holbrook SR, Kim SH. Prediction of protein folding class from amino acid composition. Proteins 1993;16(1):79-91.
10. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273(5275):595-603.
11. Hua S, Sun Z. Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction. Bioinformatics 2001;17(8):721-728.
12. Avbelj F, Baldwin RL. Role of backbone solvation in determining thermodynamic beta propensities of the amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99(3):1309-1313.
13. Cai YD, Liu XJ, Xu XB, Chou KC. Prediction of protein structural classes by support vector machines. Comput Chem 2002;26(3):293-296.
14. Liu W, Chou KC. Prediction of protein secondary structure content. Protein Eng 1999;12(12):1041-1050.
15. Zhang CT, Chou KC. Monte Carlo simulation studies on the prediction of protein folding types from amino acid composition. Biophys J 1992;63(6):1523-1529.
16. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22(17):3600-3609.
17. Holm L, Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20(11):478-480.
18. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25(17):3389-3402.
19. Slonim N, Tishbi N. Agglomerative information bottleneck. In: Solla S, Leen T, Muller K, editors. Advances in neural information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999. p 617-623.
20. Lin J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 1991;37(1):145.
21. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379-423, 623-656.
22. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22(12):2577-2637.