THE EFFECT OF BASE RATE SENSITIZATION ON END-USER QUERY PERFORMANCE MODERATED BY CONSCIENTIOUSNESS

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 774-781

  Borthick, A Faye ^a   Robb, David A ^b   Bowen, Paul L ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

base rate information; Conscientiousness, end user querying; query errors

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

BASE RATE; BASE RATE INFORMATION; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, END-USER QUERYING; EFFECT OF BASE; END-USER QUERIES; END-USERS; QUERY ERROR; QUERY PERFORMANCE; QUERY RESULTS; SENSITISATION;

ERRORS;

EID: 33744814891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ballou, D., and Tayi, G. “Enhancing Data Quality in Data Warehouse Environments,” Communications of the ACM (42:1), 1999, pp. 73-78.
2. Biros, D., George, J., and Zmud, R. “Inducing Sensitivity to Deception in Order to Improve Decision Making Performance: A Field Study,” MIS Quarterly (26), 2002, pp. 119-144.
3. Borthick, A. F., Bowen, P. L., Jones, D. R., and Tse, M. H. K. “The Effects of Information Request Ambiguity and Construct Incongruence on Query Development,” Decision Support Systems (32:1), 2001, 3-25.
4. Brunwsik, E. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1956.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr., and McCrae R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Florida, 1992.
6. Cunningham, M., and Reidy, T. “Integrating Base Rate Data in Violence Risk Assessments at Capital Sentencing,” Behavioral Sciences and the Law (16:1), 1998, pp. 71-79.
7. Davies, D., and Parasuraman, R. The Psychology of Vigilance, Academic Press, London, 1981.
8. Ginossar, Z., and Trope, Y. “The Effects of Base Rates and Individuating Information on Judgments About Another Person,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (16), 1980, pp. 228-242.
9. Halstead, M. H. Elements of Software Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977.
10. Hinsz, V., Tindale, R., Nagao, D., Davis, J., and Robertson, B. “The Influence of the Accuracy of Individuating Information on the Use of Base Rate in Probability Judgment,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (24), 1988, pp. 127-145.
11. Johnson, P., Grazioli, S., Jamal, K., and Berryman, R. “Detecting Deception, Adversarial Problem Solving in a Low Base-Rate World,” Cognitive Science (25), 2001, pp. 355-392.
12. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. “On the Psychology of Prediction,” Psychological Review (80), 1973, pp. 237-251.
13. Klein, B. D., Goodhue, D. L., and Davis, G. B. “Can Humans Detect Errors in Data? Impact of Base Rates, Incentives and Goals,” MIS Quarterly (21:2), 1997, pp. 169-194.
14. Koehler, J. “The Base Rate Fallacy Reconsidered: Descriptive, Normative and Methodological Challenges,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (19:1), 1996, pp. 1-53.
15. Koonce, L. “A Cognitive Characterization of Audit Analytical Review,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (12), 1993, pp. 57-76.
16. Lanning, K. “Some Reasons for Distinguishing Between ‘Non-Normative Response’ and ‘Irrational Decision’,” The Journal of Psychology (12), 1987, pp. 109-117.
17. Leonard-Barton, D. Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1995.
18. Rogers, R. “The Uncritical Acceptance of Risk Assessment,” Forensic Practice in Law and Human Behavior (24:5), 2000, pp. 595-605.
19. Roy, M. C., and Lerch, F. J. “Overcoming Ineffective Mental Representations in Base-Rate Problems,” Information Systems Research (7:2), 1997. pp. 233-247.
20. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science (185), 1974, pp. 1124-1131.