Gaussian-weighted RMSD superposition of proteins: A structural comparison for flexible proteins and predicted protein structures

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 4558-4573

  Damm, Kelly L ^a   Carlson, Heather A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN DERIVATIVE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ATOM; CALCULATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 33744807436     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.066654     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Tsai, C. J., S. Kumar, B. Ma, and R. Nussinov. 1999. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci. 8:1181-1190.
2. Ma, B., M. Shatsky, H. J. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov. 2002. Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations. Protein Sci. 11:184-197.
3. Jeffery, C. J. 2004. Molecular mechanisms for multitasking: recent crystal structures of moonlighting proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:663-668.
4. Finocchiaro, G., T. Wang, R. Hoffmann, A. Gonzalez, and R. C. Wade. 2003. DSMM: a database of simulated molecular motions. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:456-457.
5. Chiang, R. A., E. C. Meng, C. C. Huang, T. E. Ferrin, and P. C. Babbitt. 2003. The structure superposition database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:505-510.
6. Gerstein, M., and W. Krebs. 1998. A database of macromolecular movements. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:4280-4290.
7. Krebs, W. G., and M. Gerstein. 2000. The morph server: a standardized system for analyzing and visualizing macromolecular motions in a database framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:1665-1675.
8. Echols, N., D. Milburn, and M. Gerstein. 2003. MolMovDB: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:478-482.
9. Gerstein, M., and N. Echols. 2004. Exploring the range of protein flexibility, from a structural proteomics perspective. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8:14-19.
10. Buck, E., and R. Iyengar. 2003. Organization and functions of interacting domains for signaling by protein-protein interactions. Sci. STKE. 209:Re14.
11. Pawson, T., and P. Nash. 2003. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science. 300:445-452.
12. Hilser, V. J., D. Dowdy, T. G. Oas, and E. Freire. 1998. The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: analysis of the native state ensemble. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:9903-9908.
13. Luque, I., and E. Freire. 2000. Structural stability of binding sites: consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects. Proteins. S4:63-71.
14. Carlson, H. A., and J. A. McCammon. 2000. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol. Pharmacol. 57:213-218.
15. Freer, S. T., J. Kraut, J. D. Robertus, H. T. Wright, and N. H. Xuong. 1970. Chymotrypsinogen: 2.5 Å crystal structure, comparison with α-chymotrypsin, and implications for zymogen activation. Biochemistry. 9:1997-2009.
16. Gerstein, M., and R. B. Altman. 1995. Average core structures and variability measures for protein families: application to the immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 251:161-175.
17. Irving, J. A., J. C. Whisstock, and A. M. Lesk. 2001. Protein structural alignments and functional genomics. Proteins. 42:378-382.
18. Wriggers, W., and K. Schulten. 1997. Protein domain movements: detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates. Proteins. 29:1-14.
19. Shatsky, M., R. Nussinov, and H. J. Wolfson. 2002. Flexible protein alignment and hinge detection. Proteins. 48:242-256.
20. Kotlovyi, V., W. L. Nichols, and L. F. Ten Eych. 2003. Protein structural alignment for detection of maximally conserved regions. Biophys. Chem. 105:595-608.
21. Jewett, A. I., C. C. Huang, and T. E. Ferrin. 2003. MINRMS: an efficient algorithm for determining protein structure similarity using root-mean-squared-distance. Bioinformatics. 19:625-634.
22. Alexandrov, V., and M. Gerstein. 2004. Using 3D hidden Markov models that explicitly represent spatial coordinates to model and compare protein structures. BMC Bioinformatcs. 5:2.
23. Ye, Y., and A. Godzik. 2004. Database searching by flexible protein structure alignment. Protein Sci. 13:1841-1850.
24. Schneider, T. R. 2002. A genetic algorithm for the identification of conformationally invariant regions in protein molecules. Acta Crystallogr. D58:195-208.
25. Schneider, T. R. 2004. Domain identification by iterative analysis of error-scaled difference distance matrices. Acta Crystallogr. D60:2269-2275.
26. Nichols, W. L., G. D. Rose, L. F. Ten Eyck, and B. H. Zimm. 1995. Rigid domains in proteins: an algorithmic approach to their identification. Proteins. 23:38-48.
27. 1 human hemoglobin dimer. J. Mol. Biol. 270:598-615.
28. Kabsch, W. 1976. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A32:922-923.
29. Hubbard, T. J. P. 1999. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins. S3:15-21.
30. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
31. Reiling, K. K., N. F. Endres, D. S. Dauber, C. S. Craik, and R. M. Stroud. 2002. Anisotropic dynamics of the Je-2147-HIV protease complex: drug resistance and thermodynamic binding mode examined in a 1.09 Å structure. Biochemistry. 41:4582-4594.
32. Spinelli, S., Q. Z. Liu, P. M. Alzari, P. H. Hirel, and R. J. Poljak. 1991. The three-dimensional structure of the aspartyl protease from the HIV-1 isolate BRU. Biochimie. 73:1391-1396.
33. Madhusudan, E. A. Trafny, N. H. Xuong, J. A. Adams, L. F. Ten Eyck, S. S. Taylor, and J. M. Sowadski. 1994. cAMP-dependent protein kinase: crystallographic insights into substrate recognition and phosphotransfer. Protein Sci. 3:176-187.
34. Zheng, J., D. R. Knighton, N. H. Xuong, S. S. Tayor, J. M. Sowadski, and L. F. Ten Eyck. 1993. Crystal structures of the myristylated catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase reveal open and closed conformations. Protein Sci. 2:1559-1573.
35. Laurberg, M., O. Kristensen, K. Martemyanov, A. T. Gudkov, I. Nagaev, D. Hughes, and A. Liljas. 2000. Structure of a mutant EF-G reveals domain III and possibly the fusidic acid binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 303:593-603.
36. Czworkowski, J., J. Wang, T. A. Steitz, and P. B. Moore. 1994. The crystal structure of elongation factor G complexed with GDP, at 2.7 Å resolution. EMBO J. 13:3661-3668.
37. Shiau, A. K., D. Barstad, P. M. Loria, L. Cheng, P. J. Kushner, D. A. Agard, and G. L. Green. 1998. The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell. 95:927-937.
38. Franklin, M. C., J. Wang, and T. A. Steitz. 2001. Structure of the replicating complex of a Pol α family DNA polymerase. Cell. 105:657-667.
39. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:741-750.
40. Braig, K., P. D. Adams, and A. T. Brunger. 1995. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:1083-1094.
41. Vetter, I. R., C. Nowak, T. Nishimoto, J. Kuhlmann, and A. Wittinghofer. 1999. Structure of a Ran-binding domain complexed with Ran bound to a GTP analogue: implications for nuclear transport. Nature. 398:39-46.
42. Stewart, M., H. M. Kent, and A. J. McCoy. 1998. The structure of the Q69L mutant of GDP-Ran shows a major conformational change in the switch II loop that accounts for its failure to bind nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). J. Mol. Biol. 284:1517-1527.
43. Cheetham, G. M. T., and T. A. Steitz. 1999. Structure of a transcribing T7 RNA polymerase initiation complex. Science. 286:2305-2309.
44. Yin, Y. W., and T. A. Steitz. 2002. Structural basis for the transition from initiation to elongation transcription in T7 RNA polymerase. Science. 298:1387-1395.
45. Moult, J., K. Fidelis, A. Zemla, and T. Hubbard. 2003. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round V. Proteins. 53:334-339.
46. Teplyakov, A., G. Obmolova, P. P. Khil, A. J. Howard, R. D. Camerini-Otero, and G. L. Gilliland. 2003. Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli YcdX protein reveals a trinuclear zinc active site. Proteins. 51:315-318.
47. Yamashita, A., K. Maeda, and Y. Maeda. 2003. Crystal structure of CapZ: structural basis for actin filament barbed end capping. EMBO J. 22:1529-1538.
48. Allen, M., A. Friedler, O. Schon, and M. Bycroft. 2002. The structure of an FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11. J. Mol. Biol. 323:411-416.
49. Miller, D. J., N. Ouellette, E. Evdokimova, A. Savchenko, A. Edwards, and W. F. Anderson. 2003. Crystal complexes of a predicted S-adenosylmethionine- dependent methyltransferase reveal a typical AdoMet binding domain and a substrate recognition domain. Protein Sci. 12:1432-1442.
50. Tan, A. Y., P. C. Smith, J. Shen, R. Xiao, T. Acton, B. Rost, G. Montelione, and J. F. Hunt. Crystal structure of spermidine synthase. http://pdbbeta.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=/IY9.
51. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 2002. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA. http://www.pymol.org.
52. Flower, D. R. 1999. Rotational superposition: a review of methods. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 17:238-244.
53. Diamond, R. 1988. A note on the rotational superposition problem. Acta Crystallogr. A44:211-216.
54. Diamond, R. 1992. On the multiple simultaneous superposition of molecular structures by rigid body transformations. Protein Sci. 1:1279-1287.
55. Godzik, A. 1996. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? Protein Sci. 5:1325-1338.
56. Tramontano, A., and V. Morea. 2003. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins. 53:352-368.
57. Kinch, L. N., J. O. Wrabl, S. S. Krishna, I. Majumdar, R. I. Sadreyev, Y. Qi, J. Pei, H. Cheng, and N. V. Grishin. 2003. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins. 53:395-409.
58. Aloy, P., A. Stark, C. Hadley, and R. B. Russell. 2003. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins. 53:436-456.
59. Zemla, A. 2003. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3370-3374.