Women's responses to ultrasound examinations during routine screens in an obstetric clinic

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 721-728

  Zachariah Boukydis, C F ^a   Treadwell, Marjorie C ^b   Delaney Black, Virginia ^b   Boyes, Kathleen ^c   King, Mary ^b   Robinson, Timberly ^b   Sokol, Robert ^b  

^a ERIKSON INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Maternal fetal attachment; Observation of fetal behavior; Ultrasound consultation

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; FETAL MONITORING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

MATERNAL-FETAL ATTACHMENT; OBSERVATION OF FETAL BEHAVIOR; ULTRASOUND CONSULTATION;

ULTRASONIC TESTING;

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; OBSTETRICS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 33744802924     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.721     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Grace JT. Prenatal ultrasound examinations and mother-infant bonding. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:561-562.
2. Villeneuve C, Laroche C, Lippman A, Marrache M. Psychological aspects of ultrasound imaging during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry 1988; 33:530-536.
3. Lerum CW, LoBiondo-Wood G. The relationship of maternal age, quickening, and physical symptoms of pregnancy to the development of maternal-fetal attachment. Birth 1989; 16:13-17.
4. Lumley L. Through a glass darkly: ultrasound and prenatal bonding. Birth 1990; 17:214-216.
5. Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics 2000; 20:559-571.
6. Timor-Tritsch IE, Platt LD. Three-dimensional ultrasound experience in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14:569-575.
7. Ji EK, Pretorius DH, Uyan K, et al. Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:473-477.
8. Rustico MA, Mastromatteo C, Grigio M, et al. Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:468-472.
9. Zechmeister I. Foetal images: the power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women's reproductive freedom. Health Care Anal 2001; 9:387-400.
10. Pollock PH, Percy A. Maternal antenatal attachment style and potential fetal abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1999; 23: 1345-1357.
11. Reading AE, Cox DN, Sledmere CM, Campbell S. Psychological changes over the course of pregnancy: a study of attitudes toward the fetus/neonate. Health Psychol 1984; 3:211-221.
12. Kohn CL, Nelson A, Weiner S. Gravidas' responses to real-time ultrasound fetal images. JOGN Nurs 1980; 9:77-88.
13. Devonald KJ, Ellwood DA, Griffiths KA, et al. Volume imaging: three-dimensional appreciation of the fetal head and face. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:919-925.
14. Hata T, Aoki S, Hata K, Miyazaki K, Akahane M, Mochizuki T. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic assessments of fetal development. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:218-223.
15. Hata T, Yonehara T, Aoki S, Manabe A, Hata K, Miyazaki K. Three-dimensional sonographic visualization of the fetal face. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:481-483.
16. Kurjak A, Vecek N, Hafner T, Bozek T, Funduk-Kurjak B, Ujevic B. Prenatal diagnosis: what does 4 dimensional ultrasound add? J Perinat Med 2002; 30:57-62.
17. Boukydis CFZ. Use of Ultrasound to Influence Maternal-Fetal Attachment. Sheffield, England: Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology; 2002.
18. Cranley M. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 1981; 30:281-284.
19. Spielberger CD, Gorusch R, Lushene T. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
20. Sesti A. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in medication clinical trails. Qual Life News 2002; 25:15.
21. Cranley M. Response to a critical review of prenatal attachment research. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 1992; 6:23-24.
22. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 3:77-82.
23. Heidrich SM, Cranley MS. Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nurs Res 1989; 38:81-84.
24. Marcus SM, Flynn HA, Blow FC, Barry KL. Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003; 2:373-380.
25. Shieh C, Kravitz M, Wang HH. What do we know about maternal-fetal attachment? Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2001; 17:448-454.
26. Shieh C, Kravitz M. Maternal-fetal attachment in pregnant women who use illicit drugs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002; 31:156-164.
27. Fletcher JC, Evans MI. Maternal bonding in early fetal ultrasound examinations. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:392-393.
28. Boukydis CFZ. Adult perception of infant appearance: a review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 1981; 11:241-254.
29. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Rabinovitz R, Diamant Y. Parental attitudes toward obstetric ultrasound examination. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23:25-28.
30. Colucciello ML. Pregnant adolescents' perceptions of their babies before and after realtime ultrasound. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 1998; 36:12-19.
31. Chamberlain D. Is there intelligence before birth? Pre Perinatal Psychol J 1992; 6:217-221.