Pay for Performance Means Compliance-Based Care

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 328-333

  Dolinar, Richard O ^a   Leininger, S Luke ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL FEE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; REIMBURSEMENT;

EID: 33744797102     PISSN: 15258610     EISSN: 15389375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century (2001), National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
2. Haynes R.B. What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to?. BMC Health Serv Res 2 (2002) 3. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-2-3.pdf Available at: www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-2-3.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2005
3. Timmermans S., and Mauck A. The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine. Health Aff 24 (2005) 19
4. National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of Health Care Quality: 2004. Available at: www.ncqa.org/communications/SOMC/SOHC2004.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2005.
5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare 'Pay for Performance (P4P)' Initiatives, fact sheet, January 31, 2005. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1343. Accessed August 29, 2005.
6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Pay-for-Performance Demonstration Shows Significant Quality of Care Improvement at Participating Hospitals, press release, May 3, 2005. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1441. Accessed August 29, 2005.
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS HQI Demonstration Project: Composite Quality Score Methodology Overview, March 26, 2004. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/quality/hospital/CompositeQualityScoreMethodologyOverview.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2005.
8. Pope GC, Trisolini M, Kautter J, Adamache W. Physician Group Practice (PGP) Demonstration Design Report. Health Economics Research, Inc., for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, October 2, 2002, p 105. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/healthplans/research/PGPDemoRpt.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2005.
9. Eddy D.M. Performance measurement. Problems and solutions. Health Aff 17 (1998) 18
10. California Healthcare Foundation. Pay-for-performance programs draw mixed reviewsiHealthBeat, September 17, 2004. Available at: www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&itemID=105722. Accessed August 30, 2005.
11. Renal Physicians Association. RPA reviews senate finance proposal for pay-for-performance in MedicareRPA Member Email, July 2005. Available at: www.renalmd.org/blastemail/july05.html. Accesssed August 30, 2005.
12. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Strategies to Support Quality-Based Purchasing: A Review of the Evidence, 04-PO24, July 2004. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/qpurchsum.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2005.
13. Kolata G. Hormone studies. What went wrong?. The New York Times (2003) April 22
14. Tinnetti M.E., Bogardus S.T., and Agostini J.V. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. New Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2870-2874
15. Kenny N.P. Does good science make good medicine?. Can Med Assoc J 157 (1997) 34
16. Garber A.M. Evidence-based guidelines as a foundation for performance incentives. Health Aff 24 (2005) 176
17. Cohen A.M., Stavri P.Z., and Hersh W.R. A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Inform 73 (2004) 35-43
18. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M.C., Muir Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., and Richardson W.S. Evidence based medicine. What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312 7023 (1996) 71
19. Eddy D.M. Clinical decision making. From theory to practice, practice policies-What are they?. JAMA 263 (2000) 877-878
20. In: Aspden P., Corrigan J.M., Wolcott J., and Erickson S.M. (Eds). Patient Safety. Achieving a New Standard for Care (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC 158
21. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Quality Improvement Roadmap, July 2005, pp. 1-2. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/quality/quality%20roadmap.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2005.
22. Syrett K. A technocratic fix to the "legitimacy problem"? The Blair government and health care rationing in the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law 28 (2003) 728
23. Brase T. How Technocrats Are Taking Over the Practice of Medicine. Citizen's Council on Health Care. Available at http://www.cchconline.org/pdfreport/. Accessed August 30, 2005.
24. National Center for Policy Analysis. Are "best practices" always best? Health Issues Daily Policy Digest, December 6, 2001. Available at: www.ncpa.org/iss/hea/pd120601c.html. Accessed August 30, 2005.
25. Mottur-Pilson C., Snow V., and Bartlett K. Physician explanations for failing to comply with "best practices.". Effective Clin Pract 4 (2001) 212. http://www.acponline.org/journals/ecp/septoc01/pilson.pdf Available at: www.acponline.org/journals/ecp/sepoct01/pilson.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2005
26. Tsevat J., Dawson N.V., Wu A.W., et al. Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. J Am Med Assoc 279 (1998) 371-375
27. Part B News and DecisionHealth. Pay-for-performance prep guide. Available at: www.partbnews.com/tools/p4p. Accessed August 30, 2005.
28. Eagle K.A., Garson Jr. A.J., Belfer G.A., and Sennett C. Closing the gap between science and practice. the need for professional leadership. Health Aff 22 2 (2003) 196-201
29. Shekelle P.G., Ortiz E., Rhodes S., et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines. How quickly do guidelines become outdated?. JAMA 286 (2001) 1461
30. Costello D. Rating doctors. Who benefits?. Los Angeles Times (2005) F1 June 13
31. Narins C.R., Dozier A.M., Ling F.S., and Zareba W. The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians. Arch Intern Med 165 (2005) 83-87
32. Mendelson D., and Carino T.V. Evidence-Based Medicine in the United States. Health Aff 24 1 (2005) 133-136
33. Stoddard J.J., Reed M., and Hadley J. Financial incentives and physicians' perceptions of conflict of interest and ability to arrange medically necessary services. J Ambul Care Manage 26 (2003) 45
34. Kao A.C., Green D.C., Zaslavsky A.M., Koplan J.P., and Cleary P.D. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA 280 (1998) 1708-1713
35. Pereira A.G., and Pearson S.D. Patient attitudes toward physician financial incentives. Arch Intern Med 161 (2001) 1313-1317