Welfare, work requirements, and dependant-care

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 243-256

  Anderson, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744782440     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00279.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. H. HECLO (2001) The politics of welfare reform in R. BLANK & R. HASKINS (eds.) The New World of Welfare (Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press), p. 197.
2. M. KATZ (2001) The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State (New York, Henry Holt).
3. M. GILENS (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
4. L. MEAD (1986) Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship (New York, Free Press).
5. G. LOURY (2001) Comment on Michalopoulos and Berlin’s ‘Financial work incentives for low-wage workers’ in Blank & Haskins, The Social Obligations of Citizenship., note 2, pp. 286–88.
6. J. RAWLS (1980) Kantian constructivism in moral theory, Journal of Philosophy, 77, p. 546.
7. J. RAWLS (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press), p. 83.
8. C. HITCHENS (2004) Young men in shorts, The Atlantic, 293 (June), p. 125.
9. K. EDIN & L. LEIN (1997) Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategies, American Sociological Review, 62, 2, p. 258
10. R. BLANK (1997) It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty (Princeton, Princeton University Press), p. 153.
11. L. MEAD (1998) The hidden jobs debate, The Public Interest, 91, pp. 52–53.
12. M. J. BANE & D. T. ELLWOOD (1994) Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press), pp. 87–88.
13. K. M. HARRIS (1996) Life after welfare: women, work, and repeat dependency, American Sociological Review, 61, 3, p. 424.
14. A. S. LONDON, E. K. SCOTT, K. EDIN & V. HUNTER (2004) Welfare reform, work-family tradeoffs, and child well-being, Family Relations, 53, 2, pp. 148–9
15. S. G. ANDERSON, A. P. HALTER & B. M. GRYZLAK (2004) Difficulties after leaving TANF: inner-city women talk about reasons for returning to welfare, Social Work, 49, 2, p. 190.
16. S. DANZIGER, M. CORCORAN, S. DANZIGER, C. HEFLIN, A. KALIL, J. LEVINE, D. ROSEN, K. SEEFELDT, K. SIEFERT & R. TOLMAN (1999) Barriers to work among welfare recipients, Focus, 20, 2, p. 32.
17. S. J. OLIKER (1999) Examining care after welfare ends, Focus, 20, 2, pp. 37–38.
18. E. ANDERSON (1999) What is the point of equality?, Ethics 109, pp. 287–337.
19. E. ANDERSON (1999) What is the point of equality?, Ethics 109, pp. 287–337.
20. R. BLANK (2002) Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States, Working Paper 8983 (Cambridge, Mass., National Bureau of Economic Research), p. 73. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8983.
21. S. DANZIGER, C. M. HEFLIN, M. E. CORCORAN, E. OLTMANS & H.-C. WANG (2002) Does it pay to move from welfare to work?, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 4, p. 671
22. R. HASKINS (2001) Reform, family income, and poverty in Blank & Haskins, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management., note 2, pp. 103–130.
23. P. EDELMAN (2003) The welfare debate: getting past the bumper stickers, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 27, 1.